> My observation is that such cosmetic changes (like changing comments and
> memset/memcpy) are rejected by Hurd core developers when they are alone,
> so the only way to commit them is to merge them with more essential patch.
You are exactly wrong.
___
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:17:14PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > Index: fs/ext2/Makefile
> >
> > Why did you drop the Kconfig data?
>
> It's in fs/Kconfig and I forgot that there was any of the patch that was
> outside the fs/ext2, so I omitted it in my diff command.
>
> > I had to add this
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:32:39PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Here is a new version of the patch. Please let me know how it works for you.
(I've uploaded new versions of the kernel-patch and the kernel-image
packages to 'deb http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/xattr-hurd/ ./')
This time, after
> > Index: fs/ext2/Makefile
>
> Why did you drop the Kconfig data?
It's in fs/Kconfig and I forgot that there was any of the patch that was
outside the fs/ext2, so I omitted it in my diff command.
> I had to add this '-' there, or else 'patch -p0' got confused and
> produced this reject:
Hmm, I
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 04:48:40PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>Perhaps I can even change GNU Mach so this becomes the default
>behaviour and you can use an argument to switch to the old
>behavior.
>
> Please don't. A option that makes GNU Mach halt is ok, the default
> should be "
