Title: Nova pagina 1
CLIQUE abaixo para Download de Demonstração
Senha=123456
Listagem
dos Recursos
Controle de Estoque
¨ Contas recebidas
¨ Contas pagas
¨ Cheques depositados
¨ Controle de caixa
¨ Fluxo de caixa
¨ Mensagens internet (e-mail)
¨
Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a look at this patch tommorrow to check if it has the same
> problem with my patch and send in a new patch or I'll say what the
> problem is.
The patch worked perfectly for me!
As I've promissed, I've included my version with this mail. Perhaps
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> most of the patch should go in soon (hi Jeff ;), but please keep
> paying attention to the coding standard. If you split a line, make
> sure operators go at the beginning of the next line and not at the end
> of the current line.
Ok.
> >
2003-07-16 Julien PUYDT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* hello.c (trivfs_modify_stat, trivfs_S_io_seek): make it compliant with
the new declarations in trivfs*.h.
Please do not use wildcards in ChangeLog, you cannot do an sane search
if you use them. As for the actual ChangeLog entry, what declar
Le mer 16/07/2003 à 17:51, Alfred M. Szmidt a écrit :
> You forgot a ChangeLog entry
Here's one:
2003-07-16 Julien PUYDT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* hello.c (trivfs_modify_stat, trivfs_S_io_seek): make it compliant with
the new declarations in trivfs*.h.
Snark on #hurd, #hurdfr
_
You forgot a ChangeLog entry, please see the GNU Coding Standard on
how they look like. The patch looks sane by the way.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Hi,
I recently got some time to have a look at the hurd. I found some of the
interfaces have changed a little.
I made a patch, to be able to compile hello.c again (note: this only
makes it compile, it doesn't make it good; for example the seek function
doesn't do any check). Perhaps I'll have a l
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:00:48PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Here is the next version of my patch.
That looks fine. I flipped the logic, though, having a variable
vga_display_max_glyphs which can then be implicitely initialized to 0
(this makes the binary slightly smaller). Should be checked
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:26:20AM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:43:24AM -0500, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > 1. What errors do you still expect from the second time diskfs_lookup is
> > invoked with REMOVE? Is there any error that is allowed at that time?
> > If there is,
Hi,
most of the patch should go in soon (hi Jeff ;), but please keep
paying attention to the coding standard. If you split a line, make
sure operators go at the beginning of the next line and not at the end
of the current line.
> I also removed some dead code in pager.c that only produced some
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
