You forgot a ChangeLog entry, see the GNU Coding Standard on how to
make them.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Damn webmail client, didn't get the attachment..
Barry deFreese
GNU Hacker wannabe..
--- fwd.c 1999-05-01 18:11:51.0 -0700
+++ fwdnew.c2003-06-27 05:59:25.0 -0700
@@ -25,20 +25,59 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
+#include
+
+const char *argp_program_vers
Hello,
I know that this is very low priority but it is good exposure/practice for me. So if
someone could check it I would appreciate it but no big deal. I have added argp
option for the fwd translator..
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
GNU Hacker Wannabe...
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 07:03:52PM +0200, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > but modern *BSDs use a kernel-space "Linux approach". are you sure
> > um-pppd is still maintained?
>
> Last update was on June 19, 2003 [1]. I attempted to submit my
> patches to Brian several times, however, I never got any t
> but modern *BSDs use a kernel-space "Linux approach". are you sure
> um-pppd is still maintained?
Last update was on June 19, 2003 [1]. I attempted to submit my
patches to Brian several times, however, I never got any type of
response.
[1] http://www.awfulhak.org/~brian/
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 06:06:25PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> Interface compatible to what? The um-pppd package comes from BSD, and the
> pfinet tunnel device is interface compatible to BSD's tunnel device.
oh. I didn't know about tunnel devices; that probably confused me.
> So we
> alr
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:45:25PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:00:53AM +0200, Farid Hajji wrote:
> >
> > If um-pppd is unwelcome in the debian archives, why not
> > add it temporarily in the hurd sources, perhaps with the
> > intent of turning it later into a ppp trans
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 10:41, Robert Millan wrote:
> I don't have much experience with dbs-style packaging though. Jeff, what
> do you suggest? cdbs?
Yes - I recommend cdbs. The problem is that there's a bunch of magic in
the documentation handling because our build env doesn't behave in an
expect
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 04:41:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:47:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > > If someone beats me to it, then great.
> >
> > no chance, still on exams (and lucky that i found a
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:47:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > If someone beats me to it, then great.
>
> no chance, still on exams (and lucky that i found a minute to check mail)
finished with exams! :)
looking at the package, i
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:00:53AM +0200, Farid Hajji wrote:
>
> If um-pppd is unwelcome in the debian archives, why not
> add it temporarily in the hurd sources, perhaps with the
> intent of turning it later into a ppp translator?
sounds like a good idea; then we don't have to maintain the part
11 matches
Mail list logo
