Hey,
I figured I'd post this patch because it seems to work and I've toasted
another filesystem. Which means I'll have some more work to do to get a
decent build environment up again.
I've only done limiting testing on this. That is, I mmaped a few pages,
then mlocked them, the program d
> I don't know what's wrong with this patch, but package "gnome-vfs" needs
> posix semaphores and the implementation in this patch worked well for me
> to compile it. GNOME is broken without this, please apply.
No, fix the patch. Look in the mailing list archives for the details.
_
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:42:41AM -0500, James A. Morrison wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 09:50, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:49:22PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > > > #177486: POSIX semaphore
> > >
> > > This implementation is not POSIX compliant.
> >
> > Oops, s
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:08:14PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> One of the reasons for libhurdbugaddr is that the string be in a
> shared library rather than compiled into many programs.
Okay. It just seems crazy to have it in a shared library when that
shared library is only used by this pack