mlock for the Hurd

2003-03-25 Thread James A Morrison
Hey, I figured I'd post this patch because it seems to work and I've toasted another filesystem. Which means I'll have some more work to do to get a decent build environment up again. I've only done limiting testing on this. That is, I mmaped a few pages, then mlocked them, the program d

Bug#177486: patch for POSIX semaphore in BTS #177486

2003-03-25 Thread Neal H. Walfield
> I don't know what's wrong with this patch, but package "gnome-vfs" needs > posix semaphores and the implementation in this patch worked well for me > to compile it. GNOME is broken without this, please apply. No, fix the patch. Look in the mailing list archives for the details. _

Bug#177486: patch for POSIX semaphore in BTS #177486

2003-03-25 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:42:41AM -0500, James A. Morrison wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 09:50, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:49:22PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > > #177486: POSIX semaphore > > > > > > This implementation is not POSIX compliant. > > > > Oops, s

Re: Changing *argp_program_bug_address

2003-03-25 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:08:14PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > One of the reasons for libhurdbugaddr is that the string be in a > shared library rather than compiled into many programs. Okay. It just seems crazy to have it in a shared library when that shared library is only used by this pack