--- Derek L Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I find I have have to apply the following patch to get the oskit mach
> branch from the gnumach cvs module on subversions:
>
> diff -u -r1.22.2.20 Makefile.in
> --- Makefile.in 23 May 2002 06:36:21 - 1.22.2.20
> +++ Makefile.in
Hi,
I find I have have to apply the following patch to get the oskit mach
branch from the gnumach cvs module on subversions:
diff -u -r1.22.2.20 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in 23 May 2002 06:36:21 - 1.22.2.20
+++ Makefile.in 22 Jan 2003 19:51:48 -
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@
kernel-%.o: $(OS
Hi,
I find I have have to apply the following patch to get the oskit mach
branch from the gnumach cvs module on subversions:
diff -u -r1.22.2.20 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in 23 May 2002 06:36:21 - 1.22.2.20
+++ Makefile.in 22 Jan 2003 19:51:48 -
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@
kernel-%.o: $(OS
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 03:35:31PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> I havn't followed this thread so I'm just shooting in the dark. But
> did you add the correct entries to /etc/ttys?
tty1"/libexec/getty 38400" hurdon secure trusted console
and similar lines for tt
These patches are unrelated. One has to do with finding the initial
translators: proc, auth; the other, yours, has to do with initialization of
the system: runsystem.
Make sense?
However, here is probably a better version of your patch, since it
uses crash_system(). Returning err, causes lau
I havn't followed this thread so I'm just shooting in the dark. But
did you add the correct entries to /etc/ttys?
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
>This patch allows the computer to reboot if the user does not enter
>a value for the path to a server.
>
> Didn't I post something similar a while back?
Humm, if you did I did find it in the archives.
Looks like something ate my mail. This is what I posted:
2003-01-10
