(no subject)

2002-12-04 Thread michael
Title: New Page 1 ÀÎÅͳݿ¡¼­ÀÇ ¼º°øÀÇ °ü°ÇÀº  È«º¸ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù! ¡¡ ¾Æ¹«¸® ÁÁÀº ȨÆäÀÌÁö¶óµµ ¹æ¹®ÀÚ°¡ ¾ø´Ù¸é ¾Æ¹«¼Ò¿ëÀÌ ¾ø´Ù´Â°ÍÀ» À߾ƽÃÁÒ? °Ë»ö¿£Áø¿¡ µî·ÏÇÏ·Á¸é ÃÖ¼Ò 10¸¸¿øÀº Áà¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ºñ¿ëÀ» Àý¾àÇϸ鼭 È¿°ú¸¦ ±Ø´ëÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Àß ºÐ·ùµÈ ¸ÞÀϵ¥ÀÌÅÍ°¡ ¿©±â ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¡¡ >>Á¦°ø ÀÚ·á<< 1. ºÐ·ùµ¥

Re: gnumach2 and pcmcia

2002-12-04 Thread Daniel Wagner
I've spend some time to investigate the panic I reported earlier. Here is another bt, one I saw very often. #0 panic (fmt=0x2328b6 "\r\npanic in device driver!") at ../../../oskit-20020317+pcmcia/libc/gen/panic.c:31 #1 0x128551 in log_vpanic () at ../../gnumach/oskit/osenv_log.c:156 #2 0x1

Re: fatfs checked in

2002-12-04 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:45:46PM +0100, M. Gerards wrote: > > > > There are still two locking problems. I'm working on those problems ATM. > > > Because of those problems fatfs will most likely freeze while testing it. > > > > Even in read-only mode? My understanding was that the locking prob

Re: fatfs checked in

2002-12-04 Thread M. Gerards
> > There are still two locking problems. I'm working on those problems ATM. > > Because of those problems fatfs will most likely freeze while testing it. > > Even in read-only mode? My understanding was that the locking problems only > occur when writing. Certainly the fatfs I wrote (0.2) wor

Re: fatfs testing continued

2002-12-04 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:28:25AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Folks > > I just booted a oskit-mach kernel to test fatfs. > this went better. > > I ran "settrans -a /floppy /hurd/fatfs /dev/fd0" > oskit-mach tells me "(device drive) NOTICE: Disk change detected at 02:00" > I then "cd

fatfs testing continued

2002-12-04 Thread grant
Hi Folks I just booted a oskit-mach kernel to test fatfs. this went better. I ran "settrans -a /floppy /hurd/fatfs /dev/fd0" oskit-mach tells me "(device drive) NOTICE: Disk change detected at 02:00" I then "cd /floppy" and then " ls " I then get " ls : reading directory .: Computer bought the

[Bug #1883] Floppy Driver in gnumach-1.3

2002-12-04 Thread nobody
=== BUG #1883: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT === http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=1883&group_id=30 Submitted by: MattygProject: The GNU Hurd Submitted on: 2002-Dec-04 11:25 Category: None Severit

Re: fatfs testing

2002-12-04 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:27:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:44:06PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:15:47AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi folks > > > > > > I just got the fatfs translator install. I tested a formated flo

Re: fatfs testing

2002-12-04 Thread grant
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:44:06PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:15:47AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi folks > > > > I just got the fatfs translator install. I tested a formated floppy > > with " settrans /floppy /hurd/fatfs /dev/fd0 " > > > > when I "cd /

Re: fatfs testing

2002-12-04 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:15:47AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi folks > > I just got the fatfs translator install. I tested a formated floppy > with " settrans /floppy /hurd/fatfs /dev/fd0 " > > when I "cd /floppy " I get this error > > /hurd/fatfs: Store is smaller then implied by met

fatfs testing

2002-12-04 Thread grant
Hi folks I just got the fatfs translator install. I tested a formated floppy with " settrans /floppy /hurd/fatfs /dev/fd0 " when I "cd /floppy " I get this error /hurd/fatfs: Store is smaller then implied by metadata -bash: cd: /floppy : Translator died If i'm doing this wrong please let me k

Re: proxy memory objects patch

2002-12-04 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:29:20PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Also, it seems worthwhile to make it possible to have a hole. Maybe you > > > intended that but didn't say. e.g. an object[i] that is MACH_PORT_NULL > > > means a hole at

Re: fatfs checked in

2002-12-04 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:38:32AM +0100, M. Gerards wrote: > Citeren Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi, > > > > I checked in fatfs 0.4, made it read-only and enabled it in the Makefiles. > > It compiles but is not otherwise tested much. But this way everybody can > > check themsel

Re: fatfs checked in

2002-12-04 Thread M. Gerards
Citeren Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I checked in fatfs 0.4, made it read-only and enabled it in the Makefiles. > It compiles but is not otherwise tested much. But this way everybody can > check themselves, and we can start to treat it like the other Hurd code. cool :) Ther