On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 02:39:06AM -0800, Frank Saar wrote:
> Hm, well I did.
> But in the meantime I succeeded in getting a working version (thanks to
> marcus) and the server is running now as a translator. But in the beginning
> I didnt want to run it as a translator. Instead I wanted the server
Thanks but as I said earlier, I am not interested in an implementation
which uses condition variables in lieu of __pthread_block and
__pthread_wakeup.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:22:33PM -0800, Frank Saar wrote:
> But when I copy the server to /servers/testserver and run the client I get
> get_random_failed -303 as error.
You hopefully did not copy to the binary to this place, did you?
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
_
> Right, and like I said, they need a way to keep track of which
> conditions they need to signal.
No, for all the extant users it is already static.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:22:33PM -0800, Frank Saar wrote:
> <---client>
> int main() {
> int r=3;
> error_t err;
> mach_port_t server;
> server=file_name_lookup("/servers/testserver",0,0);
> if (server==MACH_POR
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:13:20AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > We still need a way to keep track of what they are, and the existing
> > > mechanism is basically the only way. We can either implement it with
> > > a wrapper around pthread
Hello,
I am trying to get used to the hurdish way of programming. So I started
programming some samples that should help me understanding the hurdish way
of thinking. But I encountered some problems.
I wanted to write a simple client/server program (similar to the one found
in the programmers guid
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We still need a way to keep track of what they are, and the existing
> > mechanism is basically the only way. We can either implement it with
> > a wrapper around pthread conditions, or exted pthread conditions. The
> > latter seems better.
>
> Or,
<MÒ>
dq[LÐ
¡ãALð²ó]µÈ¢ûͱ±Ö
(K¸{¶É ȽÌ[AhXÌÝ𨫺³¢j
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[AhXð²LüµÄ¾³¢B
§104-0061
sæâÀ8-19-3
æ2ECOr@3F
[}KWs
TEL@03-3544-6222
FAX@03-3544-6218
