Re: oskit driver for i8042 keyboard controller

2002-11-09 Thread Roland McGrath
> Do you mean that in fact the system comprehensively locates every > device the first time any device is opened? In effect, yes. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: oskit driver for i8042 keyboard controller

2002-11-09 Thread Roland McGrath
> Ok, well then that works certainly. :) I wish there was a solution > to the harder problem that's always bugged me though. (Dynamic > probing of hardware at runtime.) I'm sure there is. But it's not very interesting to me to think about the details much until we are actually implementing som

Re: oskit driver for i8042 keyboard controller

2002-11-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do you mean that in fact the system comprehensively locates every > > device the first time any device is opened? > > In effect, yes. Ok, well then that works certainly. :) I wish there was a solution to the harder problem that's always bugged me

Re: oskit driver for i8042 keyboard controller

2002-11-09 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:15:51PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Ok, I can try to find out where the references come from. > > Please do. ds_notify does a dev_port_lookup that acuires a reference. This reference is not released. So when the last user goes away, and the notification is sent,

Re: gnumach2 and pcmcia

2002-11-09 Thread Roland McGrath
I think the first problem is just some sketchy interactions between gdb and the kernel's own fault handling. Try picking different spots for your breakpoints and for where you try to step/next; sometimes you need to set a bkpt at a later likely spot and continue past a chunk instead of trying to s

Re: oskit driver for i8042 keyboard controller

2002-11-09 Thread Roland McGrath
> I didn't update the io bitmap offset at all task switches. I only covered > stack_handoff and not switch_context. I don't really understand what each > is used for, but it's quite obvious that it is needed in both and testing > verified the following change: stack_handoff is for a context swit

Re: gnumach2 and pcmcia

2002-11-09 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:51:50AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: > Good news. The pcmcia patch I made for OSKit seems to work, of course > including some bugs. The patches for OSKit and gnumach are here [1]. Cool! Congratulations, this is really good news. > I have two major problems found so far

Re: oskit driver for i8042 keyboard controller

2002-11-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hrm. Sure, that's fine for the main hard disk. > > You missed the point. The probe is recursive. Hrm, maybe I'm being misled by the use of "probe". I usually take "probe for X" to mean "hunt around for X until you find it". Is there a differen

gnumach2 and pcmcia

2002-11-09 Thread Daniel Wagner
Good news. The pcmcia patch I made for OSKit seems to work, of course including some bugs. The patches for OSKit and gnumach are here [1]. I have two major problems found so far. First the hda geometry scan will _only_ work if the console output goes over the serial line. Booting without any atta

[Patch #642] simple nfs cleanups

2002-11-09 Thread nobody
Patch #642 has been updated. Project: Category: None Status: Open Summary: simple nfs cleanups --- For more info, visit: http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=642&group_id=30 __

Re: oskit driver for i8042 keyboard controller

2002-11-09 Thread Roland McGrath
> Hrm. Sure, that's fine for the main hard disk. You missed the point. The probe is recursive. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: oskit driver for i8042 keyboard controller

2002-11-09 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:15:51PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Another serious bug is that my I/O permission stuff is not working properly. > > There seems to be a race of some sort. > > In that case you really want to put a bkpt at i386_exception or suchlike > and find exactly what is happen

some nfs clean up's I found

2002-11-09 Thread James A Morrison
Hi, I was cleaning up my home directory and found an old patch. So I updated the patch, took out some bad stuff andhere it is.. I tested this by attaching the translator to a node, and doing an ls on the attached filesystem. The clean ups are fairly obvious, I've mostly only added some m

Re: mkfs and fsck in /sbin

2002-11-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's questionable that they should be artificially hidden in the first > place, but hey. =) The purpose of /sbin is not to "hide" anything, but to avoid cluttering users' command namespace with commands they can't usefully ever use. ___

Re: mkfs and fsck in /sbin

2002-11-09 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 12:35, Robert Millan wrote: > do you mean that someday we eventualy won't need /sbin at all? if that's > the case i don't mind working the problem around by adding /sbin to PATH I think that's a nice long term ideal. As soon as you take the idea that users are gods of their

Re: mkfs and fsck in /sbin

2002-11-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:04:41AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > I think I see two potential solutions to this: > > 1) /sbin should be added to every users path on i386-gnu systems. The > concept of a binary that is completely unusable for regular users is > almost unheard of for us. (The only

Re: Curses console client weirdness

2002-11-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Sorry for the delay. On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 06:24:28PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > So what is the TERM setting when you run the ncurses client, and what TERM > setting is actually needed in the terminal you are running the telnet > session in? Which size does the terminal have you run