[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes:
> I hope you mean putting it into glibc, so that the rm program won't be
> special?
I have no particular preference here. It's a user-interface feature,
as I see it.
> I can see two reasons to put the versioning features in the filesystem
> rather than
Marcus used the term "undeletion" but brought up the common feature of
desktop systems that one might better call "delayed deletion" (there isn't
a canonical term I can think of). Traditionally "undeletion" has usually
referred to half-assed recovery techniques that don't necessarily work, but
ar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> At this point, it seems like the filesystem already supports
> everything we need, but we need a set of conventions about how to use
> it, so that programs like rm don't actually issue dir_unlink calls,
> but do something more clever.
I hope you
