That's ok by me. iso9660fs is a better name anyway, since it's not a
filesystem for any other format that might have an ISO standard.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Hi,
unless somebody has strong objections, I would like to check in the
following change. This is to make the name clearer, and to help new users
who use "mount -t iso9660" as they are used to. I will wait a couple of
days, and if nobody disagrees, it goes in (plus a corresponding change in
the
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 05:41:32PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Bug#162663: libc0.3-dev: depends on gnumach-dev which is priority optional
> Jeff, you can fix this in CVS, but even when we make a new package
> this won't take effect. After fixing it in the package we still
> have to reass
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 03:27:51PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> I have the grub stuff, /boot/gnumach.gz, /hurd/ext2fs.static.gz,
> /lib/ld.so.1.gz and /hurd/exec on the boot disk, im using the menu.lst
> from my main GNU/Hurd system except targeting fd0 instead of the hard disk
> and adding "paus
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 09:03:08AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Bug#162663: libc0.3-dev: depends on gnumach-dev which is priority optional
Jeff, you can fix this in CVS, but even when we make a new package this
won't take effect. After fixing it in the package we still have to reas
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:30:45PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> wasn't it a feature? =)
No. Please read that web page again, then you will understand what the
difference is.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcus Brinkmann
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 162663 gnumach-dev
Bug#162663: libc0.3-dev: depends on gnumach-dev which is priority optional
Bug reassigned from package `libc0.3-dev' to `gnumach-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
