O º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´ÙO e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼 ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù
[±¤°í-°ø°³°í¹ßÀå!] ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀº Çü¹ý, ±¹°¡º¸¾È¹ý, ¾È±âºÎ¹ý, Æø·ÂÇàÀ§µîó¹ú¿¡°üÇѹý·ü µî°ú, Çü»ç¼Ò¼Û¹ý Á¦223Á¶, Á¦234Á
--- Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:12:29PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > > Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio?
>
> > It's my intention to do that when and only when we are quite sure we
> > are ready to nix the pre-libio packag
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä º¸¾È°æºñȸ»ç
ĸ½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù ¹«Àκ¸¾È½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ¹«·á·Î ¼³Ä¡ÇØ µå¸®°í ÀÖ»ç¿À´Ï ºÎµð À̹ø±âȸ¿¡ Àú·ÅÇÏ°Ô
¼³Ä¡ÇÏ½Ê½Ã¿ä ¾ÆÆÄÆ® »ó°¡ ´ë¸®Á¡ »ç¹«½Ç ÁÖÁ¡ À½½ÄÁ¡ °øÀåµî 365ÀÏ ¾ÈÀüÀ»
Ã¥ÀÓÁ®µå¸³´Ï´Ù ÀüÈÁֽøé ÀÚ¼¼È÷ ¾È³» ÇØ µå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù ½ÃÈï½Ã Àü¹®¿µ¾÷µô·¯
ÀÌ°úÀå018-232-2677Àü±¹ ¾îµðµç ¿¬¶
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:12:29PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio?
> It's my intention to do that when and only when we are quite sure we
> are ready to nix the pre-libio package archive.
Do you have any preferance as to when that o
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä.
Àλý¿¡¼ÀÇ ±âȸ´Â ÀÚÁÖ ¿ÀÁö ¾ÊÀ» µí ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
¼Ò°³ÇÏ´Â M&A ȸ»ç Á¤º¸´Â ´Ù½Ã ¿À±â Èûµç ±âȸÀÓÀ» ºÐ¸íÈ÷ ÀÚ½ÅÇϸç È«º¸¸¦
ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
¸ÕÀú ȸ»çÀÇ Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ ¼Ò°³¸¦ ÇÒ ¼ö ¾øÀ½À» ÀÌÇØÇÏ¿© Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ´Â ÁøÇàÀÌ ºñ¹Ð¸®¿¡ ÀÌ·ç¾î Áö±â¸¦ Èñ¸ÁÇÏ´Â º»ÀÎÀÇ ÀÇ»ç·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ±×·¯ÇÏ´Ï
ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ »
> Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio?
It's my intention to do that when and only when we are quite sure we are
ready to nix the pre-libio package archive.
> 1) Try builds with Marcus' ioperms patches. This requires oskit-mach
> headers (which I have) but I would pref
I have implemented the %gs:0 pseudo-register in oskit-mach. If you are
already using oskit-mach, please update and try out the new code. What you
should now see is that in user threads %gs has a different value from %ds.
You should be able to read and write one and only one word at %gs:0. This
I changed the CC to recipients appropriate for Hurd discussion.
Yes, I've decided what to do. In fact, I should do it already.
It's already specified that the "thread register" is one word at %gs:0.
We can implement this now with a per-thread LDT using the existing Mach
interfaces, but I thi
> What parts of OSKit is GNU Mach going to use? I'm assuming that it is not
> going to use all of it...
You should build the oskit and oskit-mach for x86 (even if you're not going
to use it) so you can see for yourself.
> So far, I've already got oskit/dev, oskit/oskit/alpha, and oskit/threads
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:29:44AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:20:51PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > > > The following (one line) patch fixes the problem and I can boot
> > > > the Hurd with oskit-mach and see all my partitions.
>
> > > Cool. This fixes my boot
Title: Untitled Document
º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ
±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó Ç¥½ÃµÈ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ ¹öÆ°À» Ŭ¸¯ÇϽøé
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ󸮰¡ ÀÌ·ç¾î Áý´Ï´Ù.
Sayin Internet Kullanicisi,
Turkiye'de yayin yapanlar basta olmak uzere, Dunya'daki tum sifreli TV kanallarini
cozen ve basit bir TV kartiyla bu yayinlari bilgisayarinizdan size izleme olanagi
saglayan, sifre kirici programlarin kayitli oldugu,
DECODER CD (v2.0)" satisa sunulmustur (40 EURO +
> Ok, so the parentheses only tell the compiler to increment the pointer and not
> the value that the pointer is pointing to.
That is what was always happening. I think that you do not understand
what a postincrement does:
void* post_pointer_inc (void **p)
{
void *r =
--- Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would this not change semantics of the line by moving the pointer p before
> > dereferencing it?
>
> No, it is a post-increment.
>
Ok, so the parentheses only tell the compiler to increment the pointer and not
the value that the pointer is
> Would this not change semantics of the line by moving the pointer p before
> dereferencing it?
No, it is a post-increment.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:20:51PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > > The following (one line) patch fixes the problem and I can boot
> > > the Hurd with oskit-mach and see all my partitions.
> > Cool. This fixes my booting problem too.
> Is it reported as a Debian bug?
I've been emailing w
--- Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:34:08PM -0800, James Morrison wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > gcc3 produces warnings for code that looks like:
> > major = ntohl (*p++);
> > where p is a pointer. There is a lot of code that looks like this in
> > hu
Title: Untitled Document
*º»
¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
*e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻó °Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡¼ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.
* º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ´Ü ÀÏȸ¸¸ Àü´Þ µË´Ï´Ù.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:34:08PM -0800, James Morrison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gcc3 produces warnings for code that looks like:
> major = ntohl (*p++);
> where p is a pointer. There is a lot of code that looks like this in
> hurd/nfs.
> would the fix look like:
> major = ntohl (*p);
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 12:04:57PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > The following (one line) patch fixes the problem and I can boot the
> > Hurd with oskit-mach and see all my partitions.
>
> Cool. This fixes my booting problem too.
Is it reported as a Debian bug?
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egypt
Title: ÇѶó¸®Á¶Æ® ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏ
Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡
[±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.¼ö½ÅÀ» ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦
´·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä
- Àü±¹ Áö¿ª 12üÀÎ Äܵµ ȸ¿ø°¡ ÀÌ¿ë(ÁÖ¸», ¿¬ÈÞ, ¼º¼ö±â
Æ÷ÇÔ)
- ½Â¸¶Àå 30%, ¼º»êÆ÷ Á¦ÁÖ Sea-World ÇØÀúÀá¼öÇÔ
21 matches
Mail list logo