On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 01:59:56AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> ok, here is some hard data. It turns out that the comparison:
>*(int *) &msg.error.err_type == *(int *) &inttype
>
> is failing, with the correct number 268509186 on the left hand and a bogus
> number 65536 on the right hand
Hi,
mmh, wait a second:
const mach_msg_type_t inttype =
{ MACH_MSG_TYPE_INTEGER_T, sizeof (MACH_MSG_TYPE_INTEGER_T) * 8,
1, 1, 0, 0 };
What is this "sizeof (MACH_MSG_TYPE_INTEGER_T)"? MACH_MSG_TYPE_INTEGER_T is
just a macro defining a number:
#define M
Hi,
what happens is that the first sanity check fails on the reply message, but
I have no clue why. Maybe gcc generates bad code.
Because the first check has actually four conditions in an if, I will split
it up in multiple ifs, so I see which check exactly is failing.
Breakpoint 1, _hurd_sele
Title: APPLEcodi magazine
When you do not want this Email, Click here [Deny] please. [¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ]
[e¸Å°ÅÁøȸ¿øµî·Ï]
APPLEcodi magazine
March 31, 2002
www.applecodi.com
¾ÖÇÃÄÚµð´Â ´ç½ÅÀÇ ¸ÚÁø Äڵ𸦠À§ÇÏ¿© ¼ÒÁßÇÑ
Title: APPLEcodi magazine
When you do not want this Email, Click here [Deny] please. [¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ]
[e¸Å°ÅÁøȸ¿øµî·Ï]
APPLEcodi magazine
March 31, 2002
www.applecodi.com
¾ÖÇÃÄÚµð´Â ´ç½ÅÀÇ ¸ÚÁø Äڵ𸦠À§ÇÏ¿© ¼ÒÁßÇÑ
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 08:59:46PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that poll() is broken. gdb is one of the rare programs using poll
> at all, and I wrote this test program which hangs, too:
Uh, it seems that select() is broken, too:
#include
main ()
{
fd_set fd;
FD_ZE
Hi,
it seems that poll() is broken. gdb is one of the rare programs using poll
at all, and I wrote this test program which hangs, too:
#include
main ()
{
struct pollfd pfd = { 0, POLLIN, 0 };
poll (&pfd, 1, -1);
}
Roland, the last change seems to be:
2001-10-28 Roland McGrath <[EMAIL
óÀ½ÀÌÀÚ ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î¢Â^-^*¾îÂ÷ÇÇ µå¸°´Ù¸é ȲöÇÏ°Ô µå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù*^-^¢Âº» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡
[±¤°í]¶ó Ç¥½ÃµÈ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
º» ³»¿ëÀº ½ºÆÔ¸ÞÀÏÀÇ À¯Çü¿¡ ¾Æ¹«°Íµµ ¼ÓÇÏÁö
¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.(ÇǶó¹Ìµå, Çà¿îÀÇÆíÁö, ¼ºÀΰü·ÃÈ«º¸ µî)¶ÇÇÑ ±ÍÇÏÀÇ À̸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼Ò´Â °¢ »çÀÌÆ®ÀÇ °ø°³°Ô½ÃÆ
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 02:17:01PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> What's the signal it's taking? That looks like tcsetattr triggering
> SIGTTOU. But that ought to behave properly when you resume it. If gdb is
> doing nothing other than taking SIGTTOU and then retrying the RPC when you
> resume
What's the signal it's taking? That looks like tcsetattr triggering
SIGTTOU. But that ought to behave properly when you resume it. If gdb is
doing nothing other than taking SIGTTOU and then retrying the RPC when you
resume it, then it's fine on that end. The problem is just that term is
giving
¹«·á¹®ÀÚÀ½¾Ç¸Þ¼¼Áö°øÂ¥ ½î½º¸¦ º¹»çÇϼż ¿øÇÏ´Â À§Ä¡¿¡
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎÇÕ´Ï´Ù
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo
