[±¤°í]Ä®¶ó ÇÚµåÆùÀ» µå¸³´Ï´Ù.

2002-02-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: ²Ç²Ç²Ç²ÇÂ¥!!! Ä®¶óÇÚµåÆùÀÌ ²ÇÂ¥                 ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ ___ Bug-hurd mailing

Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results

2002-02-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh, you mean the trivial polishing stuff. No, it's not like that now. > Yes, of course, that stuff would all be done however we like best long > before any formal release. I don't mean anything particularly deep or difficult here, no. Just important

Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results

2002-02-24 Thread Roland McGrath
> I'm thinking about oskit-mach only; sorry for the imprecision above. > > Basically I mean the behavior that configure sets up a standard list > of options, and --with and --without are the ways to add or remove > device drivers; that no configuration steps are necessary besides > this. (And I

Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results

2002-02-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > gnumach, right now, is very careful to conform (as best as we could > > make it) to the GNU Coding Standards, especially, those aspects like > > the way the configure script works. Currently OSKit doesn't seem to > > work that way (though please cor

Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results

2002-02-24 Thread Roland McGrath
> gnumach, right now, is very careful to conform (as best as we could > make it) to the GNU Coding Standards, especially, those aspects like > the way the configure script works. Currently OSKit doesn't seem to > work that way (though please correct me to the extent I'm incorrect). I'm not sure

Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results

2002-02-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I already asked Marcus and Jeff on IRC whether OSKit-Mach is going to > > be gnumach 2.0. > > For what it's worth, I have no particular objection, however it's > really a sort of one-shot switch

Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results

2002-02-24 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 11:46:16AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I already asked Marcus and Jeff on IRC whether OSKit-Mach is going to > > be gnumach 2.0. > > For what it's worth, I have no particular objection, however it's > really a sor

Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results

2002-02-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I already asked Marcus and Jeff on IRC whether OSKit-Mach is going to > be gnumach 2.0. For what it's worth, I have no particular objection, however it's really a sort of one-shot switch. Once we switch, we blow away the old gnumach, and we're switc

firmlink/filemux patch

2002-02-24 Thread James A Morrison
Hi, here is my lastest multiple firmlink translator, as a patch to the official firmlink source. This is also available from http://hurd.dyndns.org/tarballs/filemux-0.2.0.tar.gz The old invocation of firmlink still works the same, but directly reading a firmlink has changed. 2002-02-24 James A