On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:40:55PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > The reason for making them POSIX shell compliant was because they were
> > supposedly POSIX shell compatible in the beginning (or maybe that was
> > Bourne shell compatible?).
>
> I don't follow the logic or see the goal. Depend
> The reason for making them POSIX shell compliant was because they were
> supposedly POSIX shell compatible in the beginning (or maybe that was
> Bourne shell compatible?).
I don't follow the logic or see the goal. Depending on bash is not a
problem for the GNU system.
> The function `remove_t
Thanks. I put in a trivially different fix. Note that this code has
probably never been really used before.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
«D±`©êºp¦b¥¼¸g±z¤¹³\¤U¾Õ¦Û±H¤F³o«Ê¼s§i«H¦Ü±zªº«H½c¤¤¡A
½Ð±z¤£¶·¾á¤ß¡A¦]¬°³o¤£¬O¤@«Ê¥i´cªº¦â±¡¥úºÐ©Î¬O¤j¸É©«¼s§i«H¥ó
ÕY±z¥Ø«e¬O¤@¦ìªÑ¥«§ë¸ê¤H¡A¸ÛÀµ§Æ±æ±z¯à¼·¥X¤@¤ÀÄÁªº®É¶¡¸Ô¾\¤@¤U³o¥÷
¥i¯à¹ï±z¤é«á¶i¥XªÑ¥«·|¦³À°§Uªº¤å¥ó
±z¬O§_¹ïªÑ¥««Ü¥¢±æ¥BµL¥i©`¦ó©O¡Hì¦]¥i¯à¦³¡G
1.¥´±q¸UÂI³Q®
sigwait() forgets to check if a pending signal is also one of the
signals the caller wants.
2001-12-26 Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* sysdeps/mach/hurd/sigwait.c (__sigwait): Check if the
pending signal is also in MASK before returning.
Index: sysdeps/mach/hurd/sigwait.c