Re: [PATCH] `daemons/rc.sh' and `daemons/runsystem.sh' depending on Bash.

2001-12-26 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:40:55PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > The reason for making them POSIX shell compliant was because they were > > supposedly POSIX shell compatible in the beginning (or maybe that was > > Bourne shell compatible?). > > I don't follow the logic or see the goal. Depend

Re: [PATCH] `daemons/rc.sh' and `daemons/runsystem.sh' depending onBash.

2001-12-26 Thread Roland McGrath
> The reason for making them POSIX shell compliant was because they were > supposedly POSIX shell compatible in the beginning (or maybe that was > Bourne shell compatible?). I don't follow the logic or see the goal. Depending on bash is not a problem for the GNU system. > The function `remove_t

Re: [PATCH] Bug in sigwait()

2001-12-26 Thread Roland McGrath
Thanks. I put in a trivially different fix. Note that this code has probably never been really used before. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

¨­¬°ªÑ¥«§ë¸ê¤Hªº±z,µ´¤£¥i¿ù¹L³o­Ó±M·~ºô¯¸,Åwªï¼·ªÅ«e©¹

2001-12-26 Thread gostock
«D±`©êºp¦b¥¼¸g±z¤¹³\¤U¾Õ¦Û±H¤F³o«Ê¼s§i«H¦Ü±zªº«H½c¤¤¡A ½Ð±z¤£¶·¾á¤ß¡A¦]¬°³o¤£¬O¤@«Ê¥i´cªº¦â±¡¥úºÐ©Î¬O¤j¸É©«¼s§i«H¥ó ­Õ­Y±z¥Ø«e¬O¤@¦ìªÑ¥«§ë¸ê¤H¡A¸ÛÀµ§Æ±æ±z¯à¼·¥X¤@¤ÀÄÁªº®É¶¡¸Ô¾\¤@¤U³o¥÷ ¥i¯à¹ï±z¤é«á¶i¥XªÑ¥«·|¦³À°§Uªº¤å¥ó ±z¬O§_¹ïªÑ¥««Ü¥¢±æ¥BµL¥i©`¦ó©O¡H­ì¦]¥i¯à¦³¡G 1.¥´±q¸UÂI³Q®

[PATCH] Bug in sigwait()

2001-12-26 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
sigwait() forgets to check if a pending signal is also one of the signals the caller wants. 2001-12-26 Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * sysdeps/mach/hurd/sigwait.c (__sigwait): Check if the pending signal is also in MASK before returning. Index: sysdeps/mach/hurd/sigwait.c