[광고]bug-hurd님 홍보용 CD타이틀을 제작해드립니다

2001-12-23 Thread 디지털투유
Title: Digital to you ¼ºÅºÃàÇÏ À̺¥Æ® Digital to you ¼ºÅºÃàÇÏ Event! ³×ƼÁð¿©·¯ºÐ Áñ°Å¿î ¼ºÅº°ú °Ç°­ÇÑ ¿¬¸»À» º¸³»½Ã±â ¹Ù¶ø´Ï´ÙµðÁöÅÐÅõÀ¯¿¡¼­ ¼ºÅºÃàÇÏ À̺¥Æ®·Î 12¿ù °è¾à°í°´ ¸ðµÎ¿¡°Ô À̹ÌÁö

Re: Update on libio with gcc-3

2001-12-23 Thread Roland McGrath
> So I decided to try something crazy: From Linux I ran: CC=gcc-3.0 ../libc/configure >--disable-profile --enable-add-ons --prefix=/usr --enable-oldest-abi=2.2.5 That's not crazy, I think that's what I suggested you try. Please report this to libc-alpha. The fix that works for that should wor

Update on libio with gcc-3

2001-12-23 Thread Jeff Bailey
I've been exploring a few thoughts on the whole glibc thing. And made a few observations. Framestate (in sysdeps/generic) calls size_of_encoded_value and read_encoded_value_with_base. Those functions are only defined in glibc if unwind-pe.h is linked in with NO_BASE_OF_ENCODED_VALUE defined. N

Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?

2001-12-23 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Ondrej Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The exception handler thread must be reliable i.e. in some trusted > task so we can count on it that it releases resources like port > rights and the failing task gets killed. As I understand it, this is not true. The exception handler thread does not n

RE: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?

2001-12-23 Thread Volkmar Uhlig
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 12:40 AM > > Espen Skoglund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If the handler doesn't do > > so the task will merely loop on generating exception, but > this is not > > much d

Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?

2001-12-23 Thread Ondrej Hurt
> > Is this thread running inside the task in question or in some other > > task? > Either inside the task or in some other task. It's all a question of > implementation. One could for instance have an external entity > handling the exception and killing the task if it that was bahaving > inco

Re: [PATCH] Mach's interface for modifying the LDT

2001-12-23 Thread Mark Kettenis
Please be aware that the Mach LDT code still contains serious bugs. Setting the segment registers to something else than thier defaults is very likely to crash the kernel. I've tried to hunt down the bug, but didn't succeed. Mark ___ Bug-hurd mailin

[PATCH] Mach's interface for modifying the LDT

2001-12-23 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
I'm hacking pthreads to allow placing stacks anywhere in memory. For the thread specific data I'm using a segment register as suggest some months ago on this list. The mach functions i386_get_ldt() and i386_set_ldt() are used to modify the LDT. Should those i386-specific functions go into libmachu

[광고]새로나온 검색엔진 아이따따따입니다.

2001-12-23 Thread iwww
Title: °Ë»ö¿£Áø ¾ÆÀ̵ûµûµû