> Be careful about one thing: if the same file occurs more than once in
> the archive, you must use the *last* occurrence, not the first, as the
> contents of the file. That might require scanning through the whole
> archive.
Scan the archive in reverse. :)
-- Ian
---
¡Ø Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù. º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í]
¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ÀÎÅÍ³Ý »ó¿¡ °ø°³µÈ ¸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼Ò¸¦ º¸°í ¹ß¼ÛÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù.±ÍÇÏÀÇ À̸ÞÀÏ Á¤º¸ ÀÌ¿Ü¿¡ ÀúÈñ°¡ º¸À¯ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â Á¤º¸´Â
ÀÏü ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.±×¸®°í ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀº ´Ü Çѹø ¹ß¼ÛµÇ´Â ¸áÀÔ´Ï´Ù.°£È¤ ¼¹ö¿À·ù·Î
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 09:48:06AM +1100, Michael Lucas-Smith wrote:
> >
> >
> >>2) Use some special `extensions translator' which automatically sets
> >>translators for files with known extensions.
> >
>
> >Yeah, this might be possible. For a start, you could work on a filemux.
> >Then you nee
>
>
>> 2) Use some special `extensions translator' which automatically sets
>> translators for files with known extensions.
>
> Yeah, this might be possible. For a start, you could work on a filemux.
> Then you need to couple the translator to start by filemux to the file type.
I personally th
There are two separate issues here. First is compiling your own programs
against the hurd headers and libraries without optimization. Second is
compiling the hurd package itself without optimization.
As to the first one, that should certainly work and be considered a bug if
it doesn't. This is
I think this was fixed a while ago.
Please test it and close the PR if so.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Title: froses_comp_01
Title: Post Message
õ×ÁÖÁÅÍÙÅ ÇÏÓÐÏÄÁ!
ðÒÏÉÚ×ÏÄÓÔ×ÅÎÎÙÊ ËÏÎÃÅÒÎ äöåô (Ç.íÏÓË×Á) ÐÏÚÄÒÁ×ÌÑÅÔ ×ÁÓ ÎÁÓÔÕÐÁÀÝÉÍ
îï÷ùí çïäïí É ÐÒÉÇÌÁÛÁÅÔ ÎÁ ÓÁÊÔ ÐÒÏÉÚ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÅÊ ËÁÞÅÓÔ×ÅÎÎÏÊ
ÏÆÉÓÎÏÊ ÍÅÂÅÌÉ www.jet.ru.
îÁ ÓÁÊÔÅ ÒÁÂÏÔÁÅÔ ÉÎÔÅÒÎÅÔ-ÍÁÇÁÚÉÎ, × ËÏÔÏÒÏÍ ×Ù ÍÏÖÅÔÅ ÓÏ×ÅÒÛÉÔØ
ÐÏËÕÐËÕ ÍÅÂÅÌÉ ÓÏ ÓËÉÄËÏÊ
(×ÏÓ
