On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 10:04:34PM +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> > I think that storeio is the only possibility to put a cache mechanism in
> > user space. But I see some drawbacks:
> > - memory user for caching can be paged out
>
> If that happens, you're doing it wrong, I think.
Of course. T
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 09:57:07PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > I see that storeio have a option "-e" that hide the device. I suppose that
> > using this option cause ext2fs to go through the storeio translator. So in
> > this case I can happily implement caching in storeio (even if we use
