Re: Bug#88690: mtrace triggers SIGBUS at first malloc

2001-03-08 Thread Mark Kettenis
From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 19:39:51 +0100 So I think this might have something to do with what _cthread_init_routine does, or with the special code in libc/sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/init-first when this function is defined. I don't understand this

Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-08 Thread Robert J. Chassell
> * doc/USER: Improve language. Remove contractions. Why is removing contractions a good thing? I prefer to be fairly informal, because it is easier to read (for native English speakers). It's hard to know for non-native speakers... I have learned a bit of Portuguese, and I

Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-08 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:16:09AM +1100, Andrew Clausen wrote: > BTW, everything ok with assigning the copyright to the FSF? Neal assigned copyright for his Hurd work, so I think it will be no problem. > In this email, I've skimmed over the issues a bit for now, > so I can get an answer to you

Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-08 Thread Niels Möller
Andrew Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neal H Walfield wrote: > > To compile (on GNU/Linux or GNU/Hurd), you need to do several things. > > Patch parted-1.5.1-pre1. Run: > > > > $ autconf && automake && automake libparted/device/gnu && automake > > libparted/device/linux > > Why do

Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-08 Thread Andrew Clausen
Hi Neal, Neal H Walfield wrote: > > This patch makes Parted much more portable by breaking code that is > dependent on the operating system into operating system specific > directories of which a single set is chosen at compile time. As a > proof of concept, Parted was ported to the Hurd. Wow!