Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Smarty-pants. ;)
Oh, and I forgot to mention that I've been using it since sometime in
the very early testing period.
From: Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Hurd user survey
Date: 06 Mar 2000 11:48:12 -0600
> 1) Have you successfully gotten the Hurd running?
Yes.
> 2) If so, is your Hurd box currently running as you expect it to?
As a GRUB developer, I should say "yes", because I can boot an
1) yes
2) I haven't got past the successful install, because of other
committments.
My next stage involves getting onto the network. I have a functioning
linux box that I am going to attempt to use as a gateway. There
appears to be somewhat of a learning curve for me there.
3) Haven't spent
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:57:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:53:56PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 02:12:44PM -0500, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > 1) The corruption always takes the form of a 4k aligned page of zeros
>
1) No.
Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
>
> I'm taking an informal survey of people who use the Hurd, to get some
> idea of how things are progressing. Please reply to me privately, or
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as appropriate.
>
> 1) Have you successfully gotten the Hurd running?
>
> 2) If so, is your H
06 Mar 2000 11:48:12 -0600
Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm taking an informal survey of people who use the Hurd, to get some
> idea of how things are progressing. Please reply to me privately, or
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as appropriate.
>
> 1) Have you successfully gotten the H
Brent Fulgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 6) If you have a corrupt filesystem, and shut it down sanely, and then
> >fsck it, fsck reports no errors. (In other words, the corruption
> >is not associated with block map errors or such.)
> Not true. I see fsck errors fairly frequently
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:53:56PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 02:12:44PM -0500, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > 1) The corruption always takes the form of a 4k aligned page of zeros
> >showing up.
>
> Unfortunately, no. The 4096 size is common in normal
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 12:05:47PM -0800, Brent Fulgham wrote:
>
> One interesting side-note is that the corruption seems to be limited to
> the "ext2fs.static" server. My understanding is that ext2fs.static is used
> for the root partition, but the "dynamic" ext2fs is used for all other
> mount
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 02:12:44PM -0500, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> 1) The corruption always takes the form of a 4k aligned page of zeros
>showing up.
Unfortunately, no. The 4096 size is common in normal operation, but untar of
gcc gives 3*1024 size block, and I also saw one 2048 siz
Smarty-pants. ;)
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://gnu.fig.org/)
Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm taking an informal survey of people who use the Hurd, to get some
> idea of how things are progressing. Please reply to me privately, or
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as appropriate.
>
> 1) Have you successfully gotten the Hurd running?
Yes.
> 2) I
> > 1) Have you successfully gotten the Hurd running?
Yes
> > 2) If so, is your Hurd box currently running as you expect it to?
It runs a bit better than I expected it to, although I never really use it
because
a) No ppp
b) I don't understand it
c) I'm hooked on FreeBSD
>
> I'm going to attempt some source staring;
And there was much rejoicing in the streets ;-)
> if someone could confirm or deny the following assertions (and add
> appropriate additional information), that would help me.
>
> 1) The corruption always takes the form of a 4k aligned page of
Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> I'm taking an informal survey of people who use the Hurd, to get some
> idea of how things are progressing. Please reply to me privately, or
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as appropriate.
>
> 1) Have you successfully gotten the Hurd running?
No. will try once again a soon as
Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> I'm taking an informal survey of people who use the Hurd, to get some
> idea of how things are progressing. Please reply to me privately, or
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as appropriate.
>
> 1) Have you successfully gotten the Hurd running?
>
No
>
> 2) If so, is your Hurd b
I'm going to attempt some source staring; if someone could confirm or
deny the following assertions (and add appropriate additional
information), that would help me.
1) The corruption always takes the form of a 4k aligned page of zeros
showing up.
2) The corruption does not happen to directo
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:48:12AM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> 1) Have you successfully gotten the Hurd running?
Yes - I have had the Hurd running in one form or another for nearly 3 years.
> 2) If so, is your Hurd box currently running as you expect it to?
Better. I have a web server w
I'm taking an informal survey of people who use the Hurd, to get some
idea of how things are progressing. Please reply to me privately, or
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as appropriate.
1) Have you successfully gotten the Hurd running?
2) If so, is your Hurd box currently running as you expect it to?
3)
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps you should instead reassign it to adduser, as that should
> be changed to avoid allocating the same id for a user and a group
> unless explicitly requested (or perhaps if they have the same
> name).
Isn't the normal behavior of Debian a
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 03:48:55PM -0500, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > The Hurd supports a feature known as "groupleaders". If your uid=gid,
> > then you count as the owner for any files with that group.
>
> Oh. That would explain it of course.
21 matches
Mail list logo
