Paul,
On Jun 12, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> pigz has many improvements over gzip.
> In particular, its --rsyncable implementation appears
> to be better than the Debian / Fedora implementation
> of gzip --rsyncable.
I wrote pigz's rsyncability to be better, but this is the first con
On 06/13/13 10:47, Mark Adler wrote:
> How do you know it's better?
I'm afraid I got that info from the rsyncable-related comments in the
pigz source code, so I don't have independent confirmation.
> pigz is designed to produce exactly the same output regardless of
> whether multiple processors
