On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 03/25/2016 08:16 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> I know that mktemp's -t is not portable, but the code in
>> init.sh was supposed to work around that. Did you see
>> some place where that work-around failed?
>
> Ah, sorry, I misinterpreted the
On 03/25/2016 08:16 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
I know that mktemp's -t is not portable, but the code in
init.sh was supposed to work around that. Did you see
some place where that work-around failed?
Ah, sorry, I misinterpreted the debugging output. I saw a 'fail=1' and
thought, "Oh, the script i
