Hi Paul,
> Am 10.11.2014 um 20:07 schrieb Paul Eggert :
>
> On 11/10/2014 11:03 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> shouldn’t it then be an XFAIL
>> if less is missing?
>
> Wouldn't it be better to not install 'zless' if 'less' is missing? Why
> install a script that doesn't work?
Of course, if t
On 11/10/2014 11:03 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
shouldn’t it then be an XFAIL
if less is missing?
Wouldn't it be better to not install 'zless' if 'less' is missing? Why
install a script that doesn't work?
Hi Paul,
> Am 10.11.2014 um 19:40 schrieb Paul Eggert :
>
> This looks like an installation problem. 'zless' is a wrapper around 'less',
> and won't work on platforms that don't have 'less'. There's not much that
> gzip can do about this, other than have 'zless'-related tests fail (which is
>
This looks like an installation problem. 'zless' is a wrapper around
'less', and won't work on platforms that don't have 'less'. There's not
much that gzip can do about this, other than have 'zless'-related tests
fail (which is what is happening here).
