On 3/21/13 9:27 AM, Ron Kerry wrote:
On 3/21/13 9:18 AM, Vitezslav Cizek wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the late reply.
* Dne Pondělí 25. únor 2013, 20:31:58 [CET] Paul Eggert napsal:
Won't you folks have similar problems with other GNU utilities?
GNU 'touch', for example. Can you propose patches f
On 3/21/13 9:18 AM, Vitezslav Cizek wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the late reply.
* Dne Pondělí 25. únor 2013, 20:31:58 [CET] Paul Eggert napsal:
Won't you folks have similar problems with other GNU utilities?
GNU 'touch', for example. Can you propose patches for all
these? Just look for O_NONBLOC
Hello,
Sorry for the late reply.
* Dne Pondělí 25. únor 2013, 20:31:58 [CET] Paul Eggert napsal:
>
> Won't you folks have similar problems with other GNU utilities?
> GNU 'touch', for example. Can you propose patches for all
> these? Just look for O_NONBLOCK in the source code.
>
These two bug
On 02/25/13 05:20, Vitezslav Cizek wrote:
> Dropping the O_NONBLOCK flag to open() solves the issue.
Doing that would have bad effects elsewhere, as it would allow
some denial of service attacks.
> A different fix was introduced to tar - dropping the flag with fcntl()
> after a subsequent read
