Ripduman Sohan wrote:
> There's a subtle bug in gzip (1.3.13) decompression when no suffixes
> are employed.
>
> The command [gzip -d -S "" ] will, as expected, ask to
> overwrite the output file. However, it goes on to unlink the newly
> created (decompressed file) resulting in data loss through
Ripduman Sohan wrote:
> There's a subtle bug in gzip (1.3.13) decompression when no suffixes
> are employed.
>
> The command [gzip -d -S "" ] will, as expected, ask to
> overwrite the output file. However, it goes on to unlink the newly
> created (decompressed file) resulting in data loss through
There's a subtle bug in gzip (1.3.13) decompression when no suffixes are
employed.
The command [gzip -d -S "" ] will, as expected, ask to overwrite the
output file. However, it goes on to unlink the newly
created (decompressed file) resulting in data loss through file deletion.
I believe the
There's a subtle bug in gzip (1.3.13) decompression when no suffixes are
employed.
The command [gzip -d -S "" ] will, as expected, ask to overwrite
the output file. However, it goes on to unlink the newly
created (decompressed file) resulting in data loss through file deletion.
I believe the
