Hi,
keinflue writes:
>> 2. I’m confused as to what makes the Coreutils test suite fail.
>
> The result from getgroups includes both the primary gid 3 and a
> supplementary gid 65534 (where the repeated 65534 are the overflow gid
> produced by viewing supplementary gids that aren't mapped i
Hi,
Just the rebased version of the patch.
From aebc32c9eb5e097130449043fa87a49b68f5e326 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-ID:
From: Arne Babenhauserheide
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:43:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Update mercurial to 6.9.5 and disable failing test
* gnu/packages/version-control.scm
Hi Simon,
Simon Streit writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Oh, worse than what I experienced.
>
> Still more convenient than typing in the password two times. I first
> thought kexec was not working. It is an improvement for me already. :)
>
> I just did a reboot with kexec from kexec-tool
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>
>> Fixes: bug#77806
>
> I would provide the complete URL, as is usually done, to avoid
> ambiguity.
Okay, done.
>> + (actions (list (shepherd-configuration-action
>> + "/etc/elogind/logind.conf")))
Hi,
Christophe Pisteur writes:
> I had the same problem since Gnome 46: even with a fresh install, as
> soon as I install pdfarranger 1.11.0, I get the message “oh no
> something has
> gone wrong...”. See:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2025-03/msg00148.html
It's weird that a fe
Hi,
[...]
> Hi Roman,
>
> I was able to reproduce this in a VM using GDM, even switching to tty2
> and trying to login as root doesn’t work.
>
> I thought this might be an issue with the bash startup but even
> switching the login shell to tcsh I can’t login.
>
> Even connecting or starting a com
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>
>> As some data point, I don't reproduce using GNOME with Wayland. What
>> is your environment like?
>
> I am using i3 (so Xorg), with no desktop environment present.
>
>> Do you have some 'guix shell' command to reproduce the failur
Hi,
On 26.04.2025 10:50, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
If there is no supplementary group reported by getgroups at all, then
coreutils just skips the test and it is ok again. Probably the
coreutils test case should remove any gid reported by getgroups that
is equal to the overflow gid before making th
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> As some data point, I don't reproduce using GNOME with Wayland. What
> is your environment like?
I am using i3 (so Xorg), with no desktop environment present.
> Do you have some 'guix shell' command to reproduce the failure?
Now that I have tried, I must say I do not
Hello,
it seems GIMP is missing some wrapping:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix time-machine -q --commit=7ff20b9e94c429f1160bd8f0db86b153a03e4683 --
shell -C -E ^DISPLAY\$ -E ^DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS\$ --expose=/run/user/1000
--expose=$HOME/.Xauthority -
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" via Bug reports for GNU Guix
writes:
> Hi,
>
> Just the rebased version of the patch.
>
> From aebc32c9eb5e097130449043fa87a49b68f5e326 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-ID:
>
> From: Arne Babenhauserheide
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:43:35 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH]
Am Freitag, dem 28.03.2025 um 13:25 +0100 schrieb Marek Felšöci:
> Hello to all,
>
> I have got some news on the subject. Recently, I found this gist:
> https://gist.github.com/laanwj/cddb2ec7d18e71066d21e5ee993fe971
>
> It proposes an AppArmor profile for Guix together with some
> explanations.
12 matches
Mail list logo
