I saw a post by Marcan¹ of Asahi Linux the other day about not parsing
/proc/cpuinfo and remembered that's what we're doing in (guix cpu).
I've included a couple of dumps below and some notes regarding future
implementation:
// My machine
(ins)efraim@3900XT ~$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/modalias
On Thu, 05 Dec 2024 14:27:14 +0800,
Hilton Chain wrote:
>
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:11:53 +0800,
> Hilton Chain wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:08:09 +0800,
> > Hilton Chain wrote:
> > >
> > > Made "#:zig-inputs" a private keyword, its value will be passed to inputs
> > > like
> > > cargo-bui
I've found the reason behind the extremely annoying SSL certification
refusals.
When I use an installation image, the date is not necessarily set at the
real date. In my case, `date` was set in 2019, and triggered the SSL
verification refusal (not yet valid).
I don't know why it sometimes d
Le 07.12.2024 10:45, ngra...@ngraves.fr a écrit :
WDYT ?
By the way, guix install did work perfectly fine despite SSL
certificates failing, does that mean that it doesn't do any SSL
certificate verification ? Is that considered safe? How about
man-in-the-middle and data-tampering attacks? A
Hi,
Greg Hogan writes:
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 2:49 AM Efraim Flashner wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 03:13:40PM -0400, Greg Hogan wrote:
>> > derivation: 83qbfg0xxsfr5lsc81m5a770c7c7b55k-rust-1.54.0.drv
>> > commit: 6e50b0c56a8cc767bd3acb26638f78c450bde718
>> >
>> > Build log attached,