Hi,
On 26.11.24 16:55, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
Dariqq skribis:
How should this work? should this be a (public?) procedure? Should it
rebuild shepherd or just copy the output with trivial-build-system?
My understanding of this proposal is that there would be a
“shepherd-foreign” package
Something changed recently (last system reconfigure?) where the 'pass' software
broke for me, apparently because gnupg is not finding pinentry, or not using it
correctly for some reason.
```
christopher@theoden ~$ pass gatecode
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
christopher@theoden ~$ cd .pa
Hi,
Dariqq skribis:
> On 20.11.24 11:46, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>>
>>> Another (simpler solution) would be to just solve the problem in guix
>>> by using a shepherd variant that deletes sbin and share/man/man8.
>> Yes, this sounds like a reasonable solution to me.
>> Ludo’.
>
> How should thi
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Indeed. As Dariqq found out, the problem was that we’d mark one-short
>> services in ‘%one-shot-services-started’ as soon as we’ve started them,
>> effectively acting as if “started” were synonymous with “running”.
>>
>> This is
Hi,
I've found a much smaller test case:
> git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/gnuboot.git
> cd gnuboot
> guix git authenticate \
> bf2b91df54aa71ecbfab891d32000ad2d6af6093 \
> "E23C 26A5 DEEE C5FA 9CDD D57A 57BC 26A3 6871 16F6" \
> -k origin/keyring
The repository only consists of 683 co
I don't know enough to be able to understand the error message out (one of
my main complaints for Guix is the atrocious error messages these things
throw), but what happens if you try to run with no substitutes?:
```
guix pull --no-substitutes
```
If that fails, maybe try something like the follo
