bug#73304: Python in relocatable guix pack leads to wrong sys.path

2024-10-02 Thread Konrad Hinsen
Konrad Hinsen writes: > This problem clearly looks like it's caused by our sitecustomize.py. > One indicator is "When I add both python and a python package": if there > is no additional package, only python by itself, our sitecustomize > doesn't do anything. I have changed my mind. In the sys.p

bug#73602: failed to compute the derivation for Guix

2024-10-02 Thread Fabrice Tudoret
Hi every one, The very first "guix pull" for a new user failed whereas it works fine for other users. Have you an idea of what I could do ? Thanks, -- Fabrice TUDORET Laboratoire du Traitement du Signal et de l'Image INSERM U-1099. Université de Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu. Bât 22. 35042.

bug#73599: packages from store paths don't propagate propagated-inputs

2024-10-02 Thread MSavoritias
With a package definition adding a propagated input. Using guix build to build a package like so: guix build --rounds=3 --no-substitutes --no-grafts --keep-failed --load-path=. and then taking the store path at the end for example: phase `compress-documentation' succeeded after 0.0 seconds

bug#73304: Python in relocatable guix pack leads to wrong sys.path

2024-10-02 Thread Rutherther via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Commit d5e0180805f52ef38a03ff9d6c11dd6174e3526b fixed a similar issue I > think, discussed at . > > Not sure whether it’s a new problem here. Konrad, Maxim, Josselin, > WDYT? :-) Hello Ludovic, if I understand correctly this commit

bug#73601: failed to compute the derivation for Guix

2024-10-02 Thread Fabrice Tudoret
Hi every one, The very first "guix pull" for a new user failed whereas it works fine for other users. Have you an idea of what I could do ? Thanks, -- Fabrice TUDORET Laboratoire du Traitement du Signal et de l'Image INSERM U-1099. Université de Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu. Bât 22. 35042.

bug#73599: packages from store paths don't propagate propagated-inputs

2024-10-02 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi [explicitly CC'ing Ludo', I hope that's OK], I don't think guix install $(guix build foo) is, or is expected to be, a supported way to install packages? Packages have more metadata attached to them than store items. I don't think that propagation is recorded in the Nix database. Nor do