Am Samstag, dem 22.06.2024 um 19:52 -0500 schrieb Adam Porter:
> Hello,
>
> Today an emergency bugfix release was made of Emacs v29.4. It fixes
> an important security vulnerability.
Note: Security bugs should go to guix-security instead. But thanks for
pointing out the new Emacs release, I've p
Hello,
Am Samstag, dem 22.06.2024 um 18:31 -0500 schrieb Adam Porter:
> […T]he patch file "emacs-disable-jit-compilation.patch" […]
> disables the option `native-comp-jit-compilation' by default [and]
> includes this warning in the docstring:
>
> "Notably, Guix removes the hashes that prevent in
* doc/guix.texi ("Emacs packages"): Expand note to talk about differences
between native compilation upstream and as used in Guix.
---
doc/guix.texi | 31 ++-
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 9bbf85e32b..
Hi Oleg,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> [...]
>
>>> Are these chown still useful in the activation snippet?
>>>
>>> (define (nix-activation _)
>>> ;; Return the activation gexp.
>>> #~(begin
>>> (use-modules (guix build utils)
>>>(srfi srfi-26))
>>> (f
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Baines writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>
>> Guillaume Le Vaillant writes:
>>
>>> Lars-Dominik Braun skribis:
>>>
Hi,
it seems the core-updates branch is first in the merge-queue. haskell-team
was successfully built by the CI and is ready to be
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> * gnu/packages/base.scm (patch): Rename to...
> (patch/pinned): ... this. Hide package.
> (patch): New variable.
> * gnu/packages/commencement.scm (patch-mesboot): Inherit from patch/pinned.
> (patch-boot0): Likewise.
> (%final-inputs): Replace patch with patch/pin
