Hi,
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 23:44, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Bug 1: emacs bundles emacs-transient.
> (Likewise for quite a few other Emacs packages.)
This is not a bug. transient.el is part of Emacs since version 28, see
NEWS:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
* New
Hi Chris,
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 21:39, Christopher Baines wrote:
> The bordeaux build farm depends on computing the derivations on one
> machine, then potentially building them on a different machine.
>
> Some of the build machines don't have a new enough guix-daemon that
> understands builtin:
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 21:39, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
>> The bordeaux build farm depends on computing the derivations on one
>> machine, then potentially building them on a different machine.
>>
>> Some of the build machines don't have a new enough gui
It looks like this build failure doesn't happen anymore now.
Closing.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Op 20-11-2023 om 11:22 schreef Simon Tournier:
Hi,
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 23:44, Maxime Devos wrote:
Bug 1: emacs bundles emacs-transient.
(Likewise for quite a few other Emacs packages.)
This is not a bug. transient.el is part of Emacs since version 28, see
NEWS:
--8<---cut h
Bug 2: no collision handling.
This is a bug, IMHO. Indeed, if an user prefers another version of
builtin modes or packages, they should not collide with the builtin
ones. Well, they do not collide when using “guix shell”:
guix shell -C emacs emacs-transient -E TERM -- emacs -q
Therefore
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 13:39, Maxime Devos wrote:
> This does not answer how the bundling is not a bug.
It answers. Nothing is bundled. It is the official Emacs.
> (IIUC, emacs-minimal is for compiling Emacs packages and for scripts, of
> which most probably have no need for keyboard-driven
Hello!
cuir...@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
> The build python-cdflib.x86_64-linux for specification
> master is broken. You can find the detailed information about this
> build href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2635702/details";>here.
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2635702/details
It seems
Hi,
cuir...@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
> The build bffe.x86_64-linux for specification master is
> broken. You can find the detailed information about this build href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2664791/details";>here.
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2664791/details
Seems this new failure
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
>> Another example: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1982454/details
>>
>> substitute:
>> substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 0.0%
>> substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 100.0%
>>
Hello!
cuir...@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
> The build python-tbb.x86_64-linux for specification master
> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2611592/details";>here.
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2611592/details
This appears t
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hello!
>
> cuir...@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>
>> The build python-tbb.x86_64-linux for specification master
>> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2611592/details";>here.
>>
>> https://ci.guix.gnu
Hello!
cuir...@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
> The build emacs-org-recent-headings.i686-linux for specification
> master is broken. You can find the detailed information about this
> build href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2603350/details";>here.
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2603350/details
Hello,
cuir...@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
> The build ffmpeg.i686-linux for specification master is
> broken. You can find the detailed information about this build href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2602938/details";>here.
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2602938/details
It seems the latest
Hi Maxim, thanks for the report.
On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 14:02 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>
> It seems something in the commits series
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?qt=range&q=2ab5e449246f98b049888dde3c310f5b4a0a64a2..b7abea0fd6a146563830db1dc4ddd0cceb6fcf1c
> either broke th
Hi,
This still happens:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
starting phase `make-dynamic-linker-cache'
GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 16781312):
May lead to memory leak and poor performance
GC Warning: Repeated allocation of v
Hi Guix,
I've checked the cement to the test and it mentioned as a candidate to be
removed as it's not stable
https://github.com/MAVENSDC/cdflib/blob/master/tests/test_astropy_epochs.py#L116
# Unfortunately, currently there is a pretty big loss of
precision that comes with
# the c
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hi,
>
> cuir...@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>
>> The build bffe.x86_64-linux for specification master is
>> broken. You can find the detailed information about this build > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2664791/details";>here.
>>
>> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/26
Hi,
I've open an issue in upstram.
Mean while please check the patch disabling the test.
Thanks,
Oleg
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote:
>
> Hi Guix,
>
> I've checked the cement to the test and it mentioned as a candidate to be
> removed as it's not stable
>
> https://gith
Hello,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> cuir...@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>
>> The build emacs-org-recent-headings.i686-linux for specification
>> master is broken. You can find the detailed information about this
>> build > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2603350/details";>here.
>>
>> https://ci
Hi,
Apologies for the delay.
nils@landt.email skribis:
> when using the home-mcron-service, PATH is set to
> /run/current-system/profile/bin . This directory is empty when using guix
> home on a foreign distro, meaning all executable paths would need to be
> absolute. This includes stuff like
I needed to tweak some xorg settings (set scroll direction, enable
tearfree, etc). On other distros, this is done by dropping files
of
config snippets into /etc/xorg.conf.d.
On Guix, this needs to be done through the extra-config field of
the
xorg-configuration record. That field requires a
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
[…]
> I wonder what the preferred behavior would be. Restore PATH to whatever
> value it had when the user ‘shepherd’ process was started, at the
> expense of making things harder to track/less reproducible? Should we
> leave it unset, possibly breaking prog
Tobias, I noticed you recently updated opensmtpd to 7.4.0 with commit
5e7f27d6ca7be84453e6d4de3d860b700ba3aef7.
I was curious if you or anyone else has seen this issue, and if I should
try submitting a patch to guix for it.
Timmy Douglas writes:
> I recently installed opensmtpd and have been
24 matches
Mail list logo
