bug#58813: [PATCH v2] doc: Document how to use Patman for patches submission.

Hi Liliana, On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 06:29, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Am Dienstag, dem 07.03.2023 um 18:39 +0100 schrieb Simon Tournier: >> I still think this documentation for configuring ’patman’ about >> “Patch management” is helpful.  I think it could be part of the >> manual.  If not fo

bug#62051: Early detection of derivations with unreadable builder scripts

Currently it's quite easy to end up with packages that have builder scripts that can't be read by Guile. This is part of the following builder script: (cons "--enable-mpi-java" #) from: /gnu/store/yngxnpcs4s6y8acxf4nwx5pcpj0j6q6i-java-openmpi-4.1.4-builder And when attempting to build that de

bug#62055: `guix pull` fails on freshly installed Guix on Debian aarch64

Hello guix​ instructed me to share the following information with you. I've installed Debian 11.6 on a raspberry pi 3B+, did apt install guix​, but failed after a guix pull​. Before posting here i tried the same steps again just to make sure i didn't stumble on a Heisenbug ~~~

bug#58813: [PATCH v2] doc: Document how to use Patman for patches submission.

Hi Simon, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi Liliana, > > On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 06:29, Liliana Marie Prikler > wrote: >> Am Dienstag, dem 07.03.2023 um 18:39 +0100 schrieb Simon Tournier: > >>> I still think this documentation for configuring ’patman’ about >>> “Patch management” is helpful.  I thin

bug#58813: [PATCH v2] doc: Document how to use Patman for patches submission.

Hi Maxim, On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 at 17:26, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > Well, I do not have a strong opinion. On a side note, because I am > > lazy, if there is no pre-configuration that I can adapt, I will not try > > patman. > > It's already there; see the .patman file at the root of the repo. > Th

bug#52257: Replace pumpa origin

Hi, On Thu, 02 Mar 2023 at 02:11, Sarthak Shah wrote: > I've sent a patch to guix-patc...@gnu.org that should fix this. > This is my first commit to the project, so please let me know if I've > made any mistakes. For reference, the patch is #61906 [1]. 1:

bug#52257: Replace pumpa origin

Hello, I have sent a revised patch to #61906 which has been altered per suggestion. Please let me know if any further changes are needed.

bug#62059: guix style looses comments

Hello, Consider this package: --8<---cut here---start->8--- (define-public ruby-webrick (package (name "ruby-webrick") (version "1.8.1") (source (origin (method git-fetch) (uri (git-reference (url "h

bug#62023: compute-guix-derivation failed to compute the derivation for Guix

Hi, Adroit writes: > The output explicitly says "you found a bug". Yes, thanks for reaching out. Sadly this is something that comes up often; a user with a failing connection can end up receiving such advice. We should open another bug to track this (there are many such reports but I don't th