Hi Liliana,
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 20:22, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
>> Maybe it could be worth to have that in the manual too, no? For
>> example, under ’Application setup, Emacs packages’ [1].
>>
> Would you prefer a paragraph, a note, or a footnote?
As you would prefer. Maybe a note wit
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 20:08, Timothée Flutre wrote:
> I have a computer with Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS". Some time ago, I installed Guix
> to try it out, which I finally did not for various reasons. But hearing the
> talk of K. Hinsen last month convinced me of giving it another try.
Cool!
> I
Am Samstag, dem 15.10.2022 um 12:11 +0200 schrieb zimoun:
> Hi Liliana,
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 20:22, Liliana Marie Prikler
> wrote:
>
> > > Maybe it could be worth to have that in the manual too, no? For
> > > example, under ’Application setup, Emacs packages’ [1].
> > >
> > Would you pre
Hi Liliana,
On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 at 16:40, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
> Done. Since I just copypasta'd the wording, I made you the author.
Oh, thanks. (It was the news’ wording. :-))
> As for this bug: I've bumped emacs-next to a version that can inhibit
> almost all native-compilation (t
Am Samstag, dem 15.10.2022 um 17:40 +0200 schrieb zimoun:
> Just to be sure, do you mean an emacs-next version which includes the
> upstream Lars’s patches? The ones that Eli and Andrea are calling to
> be reverted?
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> Sorry as
message in GUI is "could not find the KGraphViewer part", on console it's:
kf5.kxmlgui: cannot find .rc file "kgraphviewerui.rc" for component
"kgraphviewer"
Ran with guix shell --no-grafts because there is some gosh darn bug with
grafts again and even though both this and Krita report as OK on t
Compiling toml v0.5.7
error: use of deprecated associated function `std::array::IntoIter::N>::new`: use `IntoIterator::into_iter` instead
--> src/bootstrap/lib.rs:1046:31
|
1046 | std::array::IntoIter::new(options).flatten()
| ^^^
|
It didn't fail the second time though:
94/107 mutter:core+mutter/stacking / set-parent RUNNING
>>> G_TEST_BUILDDIR=/tmp/guix-build-mutter-42.4.drv-0/build
MUTTER_TEST_PLUGIN_PATH=/tmp/guix-build-mutter-42.4.drv-0/build/src/compositor/plugins/libdefault.so
MALLOC_PERTURB_=247
G_TEST_SRCDIR=/
I'm getting this after the recent updates:
sha256 hash mismatch for
/gnu/store/iv6ixlrvh0swq22fjal0cbfbr9ayaq7m-akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz:
expected hash: 1yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8
actual hash: 08n713271i7ifnbrgwrqmxvcpvj45wfqjiidw8zf9rpwxg2m2m9g
However what conc
From: Brendan Tildesley
* gnu/packages/kde.scm (akregator): Use correct hash.
---
gnu/packages/kde.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde.scm b/gnu/packages/kde.scm
index 1d4321237a..37125b1d0b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/kde.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages
From: Brendan Tildesley
* gnu/packages/kde.scm (akregator)[phases]: Fix finding
QtWebEngineProcess path.
---
gnu/packages/kde.scm | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde.scm b/gnu/packages/kde.scm
index 37125b1d0b..d0ffb28505 100644
--- a/gnu/pac
Hi,
unfortunately incorrect hash was pushed in the last patchset.
The patch is already part of the next patch series [1].
Also it's tracked here [2].
1
https://github.com/phodina/guix/commit/4636279dfb3b96eb5836baad0d8ea36e58ff79ee
2 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57608#8
Petr
Sent with
12 matches
Mail list logo
