bug#58221: confirmation

2022-10-03 Thread Attila Lendvai
i can confirm this. and thanks for including a bandaid! -- • attila lendvai • PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39 -- “There is no single effort more radical in its potential for saving the world than a transformation of the way we raise our children.” — Marianne Williamson (1952–)

bug#58149: Letting clients warn about old daemons

2022-10-03 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, (Cc: Mathieu O. + Maxim.) Matthieu Haefele skribis: > I worked intensively with guix this summer, I did not get any > deprecation warnings, I am quite sure. And I still do not get any. So > might be a good idea to check the deprecation machinery. > > (base) mhaefele@mdlspc113:~ $ guix shell

bug#58149: guix pull error

2022-10-03 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Matthieu Haefele skribis: >> I would suggest doing a two-step upgrade; first upgrade to 1.3.0: >> >>sudo -i guix pull --commit=a0178d34f582b50e9bdbb0403943129ae5b560ff > > Are you sure this commit is old enough ? I still get the same error. > By the way, a general question, where can you

bug#58149: guix pull error

2022-10-03 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Matthieu Haefele skribis: >> So you’re right, we have to go a bit further back in time! Apparently >> v1.2.0 will do, so: >> >>guix pull --commit=a099685659b4bfa6b3218f84953cbb7ff9e88063 >> > Not better unfortunately... > > (base) mhaefele@mdlspc113:ksp $ sudo -i guix pull > --commit=a09968

bug#58149: guix pull error

2022-10-03 Thread Matthieu Haefele
Hi, Le 03/10/2022 à 11:17, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : Matthieu Haefele skribis: I would suggest doing a two-step upgrade; first upgrade to 1.3.0: sudo -i guix pull --commit=a0178d34f582b50e9bdbb0403943129ae5b560ff Are you sure this commit is old enough ? I still get the same error. By th

bug#58274: giac 1.9.0-21 fails to build

2022-10-03 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi, The build of giac fails like: --8<---cut here---start->8--- libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DIN_GIAC -I. -I.. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -DGIAC_GENERIC_CONSTANTS -DTIMEOUT -DHAVE_LIBMICROPYTHON -fpermissive -DQUICKJS -MT alg_ext

bug#58149: guix pull error

2022-10-03 Thread Matthieu Haefele
Le 03/10/2022 à 16:03, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : Matthieu Haefele skribis: So you’re right, we have to go a bit further back in time! Apparently v1.2.0 will do, so: guix pull --commit=a099685659b4bfa6b3218f84953cbb7ff9e88063 Not better unfortunately... (base) mhaefele@mdlspc113:ksp $

bug#58149: Letting clients warn about old daemons

2022-10-03 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > (Cc: Mathieu O. + Maxim.) > > Matthieu Haefele skribis: > >> I worked intensively with guix this summer, I did not get any >> deprecation warnings, I am quite sure. And I still do not get any. So >> might be a good idea to check the deprecation machinery. >

bug#42162: gforge.inria.fr to be taken off-line in Dec. 2020

2022-10-03 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi, zimoun writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 at 23:10, Maxim Cournoyer > wrote: > >> Wholly agreed, this thread is already too long and the original problem >> was fixed. Closing. > > I disagree, the original problem is not fixed; as I explained. Well, > since you consider it is, please

bug#37244: Icecat Audio Issues

2022-10-03 Thread Maxime Devos
On 30-09-2022 05:08, Mark H Weaver wrote: One of the differences between Firefox and IceCat is the default value of the "privacy.resistFingerprinting" setting in . The default in Firefox is "false", and the default in IceCat is "true". I've found that some audio/video players that misbehave in

bug#58149: Unable to pull when using a pre-lzip version of guix-daemon

2022-10-03 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
I’d just like to note what I do when I’m finding myself in a situation where I’m tempted to run “guix pull” from a very old version of Guix: 1. visit https://ci.guix.gnu.org and select the “guix” jobset. 2. select a recent successful evaluation, e.g. https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/686692 3. select

bug#58204: guix system reconfigure hangs silently when substitute server is unreachable

2022-10-03 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > While fixing up Berlin today, I had to use '--no-substitutes' on the > daemon started per 'info (guix)Chrooting', otherwise it'd hang up > without printing any of the warnings (totally silent). Using strace, I > could see: > > guix substitute: warning: ci.guix.gnu

bug#58204: guix system reconfigure hangs silently when substitute server is unreachable

2022-10-03 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> While fixing up Berlin today, I had to use '--no-substitutes' on the >> daemon started per 'info (guix)Chrooting', otherwise it'd hang up >> without printing any of the warnings (totally silent). Using strace, I >> could see:

bug#58285: secrets crashes when unlocking database

2022-10-03 Thread kiasoc5--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
(.secrets-real:8886): Gtk-WARNING **: 01:35:46.681: GtkText - did not receive a focus-out event. If you handle this event, you must return GDK_EVENT_PROPAGATE so the default handler gets the event as well Traceback (most recent call last): File "/gnu/store/b07y8a2axslnz97pjdg7lp73xwk1gf8w-pyth