On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 04:35:23PM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> elogind commit 7db52c01ed07f543f8272ea9a726cb542e771595 is the first
> elogind version that does not launch, but it is too entangled to
> simply revert. I will take another look tomorrow.
This was a dead end. With 7db5
> I clarified this and ensures ‘chfn’ is actually usable in commit
> c76775263e56a10cc1b84d03a5827f42436afe40.
Oops, I hadn’t pushed; the right commit ID is
671e6a81804f264ddcdd6fe7579644404da079b8.
Ludo’.
Hello Thiago,
Thiago Jung Bauermann [2021-12-31T05:06:52+0100]:
> Hello Sergiu, Hello Pāladhammika,
>
> Em terça-feira, 28 de dezembro de 2021, às 09:16:32 -03, Sergiu Ivanov
> escreveu:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am chiming in to say that I have the same issue. In my case this
>> doesn't seem related
> What would be the best way to fix this?
> - keep a mozjs-78.6 package around just for 0ad
> - patch 0ad to fix the compatibility issues with mozjs 78.15
> - use the mozjs version bundled in the 0ad sources
>
> WDYT?
Keeping mozjs-78.6 just for 0ad will probably make things harder later
on b
Am Samstag, dem 01.01.2022 um 12:14 -0700 schrieb Jesse Gibbons:
> > What would be the best way to fix this?
> > - keep a mozjs-78.6 package around just for 0ad
> > - patch 0ad to fix the compatibility issues with mozjs 78.15
> > - use the mozjs version bundled in the 0ad sources
> >
> > W
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 04:54:51PM -0700, Aiko Kyle wrote:
> I'm new to guix so I'm really struggling to debug this strange issue.
> On the latest master I can run 'guix pull', and the latest guix seems
> to build just fine, however when I go to do 'guix system reconfigure',
> building guix fails t
Attached is the output of guix system shepherd-graph
gnu/system/examples/desktop.tmpl on commit 2a49ddb513
graph.dot
Description: MS-Word document
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 10:24:18PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> I had researched this before and the option the git server is missing is
>> uploadpack.allowAnySHA1InWant [0]. Unfortunately last I check in
>> #savannah their machine (vcs0) is using an older Tri
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 9:51 PM Leo Famulari wrote:
>
> Thanks, and I've attached a graph of the same operating system
> declaration from the same revision of Guix but for x86_64, along with
> rendered images of both graphs.
>
> The graphs clearly show that xorg-server is provided in two places on
