Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 22-12-2021 om 08:57 [+0100]:
> For the record, guile has been a part of the system profile since
> %base-packages were first defined, so if your load paths break, there
> is probably a larger issue at hand. In this particular case, your
> local guix profile ough
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 22-12-2021 om 08:57 [+0100]:
> No. The Guix command as built by `guix pull' sets its own load path,
> but respects system paths too. You can check by spawning a REPL: [...]
But are there any good reasons to respect $GUILE_LOAD{,_COMPILE}_PATH
at all? Usually,
Am Mittwoch, dem 22.12.2021 um 11:32 +0100 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 22-12-2021 om 08:57 [+0100]:
> > No. The Guix command as built by `guix pull' sets its own load path,
> > but respects system paths too. You can check by spawning a REPL:
> > [...]
>
> But are
Hello,
"bdju" via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes:
> guix system
> guix (GNU Guix) b3a0db7a0e5fa7186c090647cfd5666e2b9287ff
> sway
>
> In keepassxc the menus don't show anything when clicked.
> (actually, I restarted it and now they work, but leaving that in to show
> it was multiple programs)
>
Em sex, 2021-09-17 às 14:32 +0200, Jelle Licht escreveu:
>
> Hello Andreas,
>
> Andreas Reuleaux writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > python-hy fails to install for me - because there are issues with
> > python-funcparserlib, as I understand (or tox - cf the end of the
> > log below).
> >
>
> It seems
On Wed Dec 22, 2021 at 5:20 AM CST, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> This seems like those programs are running with the XCB backend, using
> XWayland, rather than directly using Wayland.
`swaymsg -t get_tree` output shows they have an app_id instead of a
class, this is how I'm determining they're using W
Vinicius Monego writes:
> Em sex, 2021-09-17 às 14:32 +0200, Jelle Licht escreveu:
>>
>> Hello Andreas,
>>
>> Andreas Reuleaux writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > python-hy fails to install for me - because there are issues with
>> > python-funcparserlib, as I understand (or tox - cf the end of th
Em qua, 2021-12-22 às 16:00 +0100, Jelle Licht escreveu:
> Vinicius Monego writes:
>
> > Em sex, 2021-09-17 às 14:32 +0200, Jelle Licht escreveu:
> > >
> > > Hello Andreas,
> > >
> > > Andreas Reuleaux writes:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > python-hy fails to install for me - because ther
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021, Leo Famulari wrote:
If there is a particular plugin that is actually required for some
package, we could use the gst-plugins/selection procedure to add the
dependency while hopefully increasing the closure size by less than 1
GiB.
Leo,
Thanks for pointing this out, it t
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
Hello Jack,
Jack Hill writes:
Should leaf applications that use webkitgtk be wrapped to find the
right gst-plugins? This seems suboptimal to me. If the plugins are
really dependencies of webkitgtk then perhaps they should be encoded
that way in Gui
So, I took some time to do some digging this morning, and I now have a
few results and a few more questions.
First, I tried `guix shell --pure python beets beets-bandcamp` to ensure
that the plugin would be detected once `GUIX_PYTHONPATH` was set as You
had mentioned. That did work, though the
Hi,
Christopher Rodriguez schreef op wo 22-12-2021 om 12:07 [-0500]:
> So, I took some time to do some digging this morning, and I now have a
> few results and a few more questions.
>
> First, I tried `guix shell --pure python beets beets-bandcamp` to ensure
> that the plugin would be detected
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:38:44PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports
for GNU Guix wrote:
> (initrd-modules
>;; This cannot be built as a module for linux-libre-lts.
>((@ (srfi srfi-1) delete) "simplefb" %base-initrd-modules))
Sorry if this question has already been answered, b
>+(define (lchown-recursive file owner group)
>+ "As 'lchown' but recursively, change ownership of FILE to the
>integer values
>+OWNER and GROUP without dereferencing symbolic links it encounter."
>+ (nftw file
>+(lambda (filename statinfo flag base level)
>+ (catch 'system-error
Hi Leo,
On 2021-12-22 19:28, Leo Famulari wrote:
Or all linux-libre packages aside from the 5.15 series?
This.
I'm inclined to just revert the commit that introduced the regression
until we have a better solution...
I think this is merely trading one regression for another, IMO
*slightly*
unknown users
of the conflicting DRM module, I mean.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
I've been digging through the source, and it seems as though
`python-build-system` does not actually set the $GUIX_PYTHONPATH
variable in the environment. That variable seems to only be set by
`python-2.7` and its derivatives, including `python3.9`, during a step
after the install process.
I
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 08:25:27PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> This.
Well, I guess this episode demonstrates that people are using 5.15,
5.10, and not much else. It's useful information.
> > I'm inclined to just revert the commit that introduced the regression
> > until we have a better
Christopher Rodriguez schreef op wo 22-12-2021 om 14:59 [-0500]:
> I've been digging through the source, and it seems as though
> `python-build-system` does not actually set the $GUIX_PYTHONPATH
> variable in the environment. That variable seems to only be set by
> `python-2.7` and its derivativ
Maxime Devos schreef op wo 22-12-2021 om 20:50 [+]:
> python-build-system doesn't GUIX_PYTHONPATH, because that's the job of
> the native-search-paths of python. [...]
>
Correction, it does set that environment variable in 'add-installed-
pythonpath', but it only adds a few things and it does
Hi,
Christopher Rodriguez schreef op wo 22-12-2021 om 14:59 [-0500]:
> Right now, beets is still calling the version of python in
> `/gnu/store`,
> but since it isn't installed alongside `beets` as a propagated-input
> the
> post-install step which sets that variable (which is called
> `install
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 09:19:20PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Would someone like to write a proper commit message and add a code
> comment?
How about the attached patch? I'd like to push this soon, because it's a
severe problem for some users.
From ab9c4de76dea889e5d05bcf7fa173868357d5f44 Mon Se
On 12/22/21 3:50 PM, Maxime Devos wrote:
python-build-system doesn't GUIX_PYTHONPATH, because that's the job of
the native-search-paths of python. When a python library is being
built, GUIX_PYTHONPATH is set because the library has python among its
(implicit) inputs. The same holds for profile
Hello,
zimoun skribis:
> In guix/modules.scm:
>157:28 5 (module-closure _ #:select? _ #:dependencies _)
> In guix/memoization.scm:
> 100:0 4 (_ # "/gnu/store/dljzmm…" …)
> In ice-9/ports.scm:
>445:17 3 (call-with-input-file _ _ #:binary _ #:encoding _ # _)
> In guix/modules.scm:
>
Hi,
Jacob First skribis:
> After I apply this configuration with `guix system reconfigure', I
> expect /etc/passwd to have been updated with "New Comment" in place of
> "Old Comment". However, "Old Comment" remains.
This is on purpose, per these lines in ‘allocate-passwd’ in (gnu build
accounts
Hi,
Cayetano Santos skribis:
> In guix/scripts/environment.scm:
> 627:17 5 (_ _)
> 576:23 4 (validate-exit-status _ _ 32512)
> In guix/utils.scm:
>954:4 3 (string-closest _ _ #:threshold _)
> In guix/combinators.scm:
>46:32 2 (fold2 #guix/utils.scm:954:…> …)
> In ice-9/boot-9
Hi Cayetano,
Cayetano Santos skribis:
> Following command works
>
>guix shell --container -m manifest.scm -- python3
>
> But
>
>guix shell --container -- python3
>
> gives an error. However,
>
>guix shell --container
>
> followed by
>
>python3
>
> works.
>
> So, by just removi
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Rodriguez skribis:
> FAIL: tests/guix-git-authenticate
> =
>
> + '[' -d /home/ming/Downloads/guix/.git ']'
> + guile -c '(use-modules (git))
> (member "refs/heads/keyring" (branch-list (repository-open ".")))'
> + intro_commit=9edb3f6
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 04:16:30PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 09:19:20PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > Would someone like to write a proper commit message and add a code
> > comment?
>
> How about the attached patch? I'd like to push this soon, because it's a
> severe pr
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:36:25PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly
> > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG
> > > 2.2.32.
>
G-expressions currently do not consistently preserve the distinction
between #nil and '(), which causes trouble for programs that rely on
that distinction. In particular, the issue affects programs that use
(guix build json), because that library uses #nil to represent the JSON
value `null', wh
Hi,
Philip McGrath schreef op wo 22-12-2021 om 23:25 [-0500]:
> G-expressions currently do not consistently preserve the distinction
> between #nil and '(), which causes trouble for programs that rely on
> that distinction. In particular, the issue affects programs that use
> (guix build json),
32 matches
Mail list logo
