bug#46209: 46043 breaks booting with custom shepherd package

2021-01-31 Thread Oleg Pykhalov
Before applied patch [1] I used a hack to override shepherd package: (module-set! (resolve-module '(gnu packages admin)) 'shepherd shepherd-patched) Now on Guix commit eb6b061 I cannot use the previous override, and also the mentioned in [1] way overriding shepherd package doesn't work:

bug#46212: ci.guix.gnu.org narinfos with excessive NarSize

2021-01-31 Thread Christopher Baines
I noticed through the Guix Data Service that some narinfo files from ci.guix.gnu.org have an excessive NarSize. These are the three that I've found, but there could be more. /gnu/store/qln574djfgl8h9glij9id8jips7nnrlw-flightgear-2018.3.5 NarSize: 18446744072099351584 /gnu/store/qhix6afvy2a6n7hl

bug#46212: ci.guix.gnu.org narinfos with excessive NarSize

2021-01-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Christopher Baines skribis: > /gnu/store/qln574djfgl8h9glij9id8jips7nnrlw-flightgear-2018.3.5 > NarSize: 18446744072099351584 > > /gnu/store/qhix6afvy2a6n7hlx4qgdns461p8kdnv-repeat-masker-4.1.1 > NarSize: 18446744071612438544 > > /gnu/store/wd9z64xpck56xzf52jwlpg8vb610b0ym-repeat-masker-4.1.1 > N

bug#46154: Not able to get Hindi "Input Method" to add in listing of available input methods in non-gnome wm like stumpwm

2021-01-31 Thread Arun Isaac
Hi, I don't know much about the state of ibus in Guix. When last I checked a few years ago, I couldn't get it to work for Tamil. So, I tried uim and it worked. Perhaps, just as an immediate workaround until this bug is addressed, maybe you could try uim? My uim setup is as follows. You probably

bug#46209: 46043 breaks booting with custom shepherd package

2021-01-31 Thread Maxime Devos
On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 15:46 +0300, Oleg Pykhalov wrote: > Before applied patch [1] I used a hack to override shepherd package: > > (module-set! (resolve-module '(gnu packages admin)) 'shepherd > shepherd-patched) > > Now on Guix commit eb6b061 I cannot use the previous override, and also > t

bug#45992: A "live" profile is missing

2021-01-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Leo, Leo Famulari skribis: > I don't think that this message is really relevant to the bug report. It > describes some corrupted store items on my computer and might be > interesting as examples of what goes wrong when /gnu/store is writable. > > This is on Debian, where /gnu/store is just a

bug#45992: A "live" profile is missing

2021-01-31 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 05:40:50PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > We now provide a ‘gnu-store.mount’ systemd service that makes /gnu/store > read-only, as on Guix System. I suppose it wasn’t enabled on this > machine, right? Thanks for pointing that out. This installation of Guix is very old. I'

bug#46209: 46043 breaks booting with custom shepherd package

2021-01-31 Thread Oleg Pykhalov
Hello, Thank you for the fast responce. First of all I want to ask did you try to override Shepherd yourself? It would be helpful to have a paragraph in the documentation how to override the Shepherd, and if you know a proper way, please add a small example of operating-system definition with ov

bug#46194: [PATCH] gnu: opendoas: Update to 6.8.1.

2021-01-31 Thread Brice Waegeneire
* gnu/packages/admin.scm (opendoas): Update to 6.8.1. Fixes #46194. --- As there isn't any service for this package (I'm working on it), it's quite useless and there isn't any package depending on it. I guess very few people, if any, are using it so I see no need for grafting here. gnu/packages

bug#46194: [PATCH] gnu: opendoas: Update to 6.8.1.

2021-01-31 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 08:41:07PM +0100, Brice Waegeneire wrote: > * gnu/packages/admin.scm (opendoas): Update to 6.8.1. > > Fixes #46194. > --- > As there isn't any service for this package (I'm working on it), it's quite > useless and there isn't any package depending on it. I guess very few >

bug#46194: [PATCH] gnu: opendoas: Update to 6.8.1.

2021-01-31 Thread me--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Brice, On 2021-01-31 20:41, Brice Waegeneire wrote: * gnu/packages/admin.scm (opendoas): Update to 6.8.1. Thanks for the prompt security bump! The number of CVE fixes I've pushed for sudo the past year has made me reconsider its use in favour of this package. As there isn't any service fo

bug#46209: 46043 breaks booting with custom shepherd package

2021-01-31 Thread Maxime Devos
On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 22:49 +0300, Oleg Pykhalov wrote: > (operating-system > > (inherit base-system) > > (essential-services > > (modify-services (operating-system-default-essential-services > base-system) > >(shepherd-root-service-type config => (shepherd-configuration

bug#46209: 46043 breaks booting with custom shepherd package

2021-01-31 Thread Maxime Devos
When using the operating system configuration adjusted to use this-operating-system, the VM boots just fine for me (adjusted configuration should be sent with previous e-mail). Could you confirm? I haven't tried using the original system configuration yet. signature.asc Description: This is a d

bug#46209: 46043 breaks booting with custom shepherd package

2021-01-31 Thread Maxime Devos
On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 22:49 +0300, Oleg Pykhalov wrote: > [...] > First of all I want to ask did you try to override Shepherd yourself? Yes, and I can confirm I could use #:supplementary-groups in service definitions. I override Shepherd with the mechanism in [1], not with module-set!, however.

bug#41669: Cross-compiled powerpc64-linux bootstrap-tarballs not reproducible

2021-01-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Chris & all, Apologies for taking so long to reply! Pinging me on IRC was the right move. :-) Chris Marusich skribis: > I'm afraid I've hit a snag using what you've uploaded, though. It looks > like we'll need to extract bash, mkdir, tar, and xz from > static-binaries-0-powerpc64le-linux-

bug#46209: 46043 breaks booting with custom shepherd package

2021-01-31 Thread Oleg Pykhalov
Maxime Devos writes: > When using the operating system configuration > adjusted to use this-operating-system, the VM > boots just fine for me (adjusted configuration > should be sent with previous e-mail). Could > you confirm? Thank you! VM boots, and my desktop machine boots with shepherd-pat

bug#46209: 46043 breaks booting with custom shepherd package

2021-01-31 Thread Oleg Pykhalov
Maxime Devos writes: […] >> It would be helpful to have a paragraph in the documentation how to >> override the Shepherd, and if you know a proper way, please add a small >> example of operating-system definition with overriden Shepherd and a >> basic service like OpenSSH. > > Yes, would be very