bug#43151: Resolve Calibre run-time dependency

2020-09-09 Thread Prafulla Giri
I see. Thank you for the update. Hopefully (wrap-program) will be fixed soon. That should save us a lot of code-duplication. Congratulations, Mr. Tildesley! (:

bug#43291: ntp or nptd services on aarch64

2020-09-09 Thread Vtly Shtrv
Hello Guixen. >From the Guix System (aarch64) powering a RockPro64 SBC. What's broken: ntp-service-type chrony How it's broken: ntp-service-type segfaults (Mike seen). chrony segfaults: `guix describe` ---> guix 81ea278 `cat /home/vits/tmp/c ---> pool poo

bug#43293: Icecat is missing glyphs after the last update

2020-09-09 Thread Marinus Savoritias
The numbers and some of the letters are missing from the last release. If I open the guix home page in the Download button the numbers are not shown for example. Also the star is missing from the bookmark button on the top. Guix git commit: guix 057d584 repository URL: https://git.savann

bug#43293: Icecat is missing glyphs after the last update

2020-09-09 Thread Marinus Savoritias
I forgot to add that the issue seems specific to icecat. Qutebrowser works fine. Marinus Savoritias On 9/9/20 3:08 PM, Marinus Savoritias wrote: The numbers and some of the letters are missing from the last release. If I open the guix home page in the Download button the numbers are not shown

bug#26170: Bug #26170 Hunting: doc: Explanation of propagated-inputs unclear

2020-09-09 Thread zimoun
Dear, The bug 26170 [1] is about the description of “propagated inputs” in the manual. Currently, the term “propagated inputs” in the index [2] goes to the section “Invoking guix package” [3] and explaining: Sometimes packages have propagated inputs: these are dependencies that a

bug#28659: Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash

2020-09-09 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > One thing I don’t quite like about the patch is the fact that ‘guix > substitutes’ connects to the daemon in ‘content-addressed-item?’. What is the status of this patch [1] following the recent discussion about tar “disarchive” and SWH?

bug#26170: Bug #26170 Hunting: doc: Explanation of propagated-inputs unclear

2020-09-09 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
Thank you for bringing up this bug again with detailed cross-referencing. Sorry for not sending a patch earlier. I do not think it makes sense to close yet. I attach a proposed patch now (its text is not properly wrapped yet). It may contain misunderstandings about propagated inputs as I have n

bug#35085: Emacs is not reproducible

2020-09-09 Thread zimoun
Dear, Just a heads-up to say that this still applies to 27.1. --8<---cut here---start->8--- guix describe Generation 86 Sep 09 2020 12:21:38(current) guix ce022b2 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git commit: ce022b2e142c75b9

bug#26170: Bug #26170 Hunting: doc: Explanation of propagated-inputs unclear

2020-09-09 Thread zimoun
On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 17:10, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > Thank you for bringing up this bug again with detailed > cross-referencing. Sorry for not sending a patch earlier. My pleasure. :-) >>From fd4955cd0a61e92c37a371e4c5411a505ad5ac76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Florian Pe

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-09-09 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 12:57, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. Commit d4e4a3824d380e576b56a74aa714db205fcc59a4 adds pandoc. The packages: - ruby-pandoc-ruby - rapicorn - ganeti - manuskript - emacs-org-web-tools - emacs-ox-pando

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-09-09 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
zimoun writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 12:57, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. > > Commit d4e4a3824d380e576b56a74aa714db205fcc59a4 adds pandoc. > > The packages: > > - ruby-pandoc-ruby > - rapicorn > - ganeti > - manuskript

bug#34505: [guix, conda]: conda build fail on ubuntu 17.10 (91 errors)

2020-09-09 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi, with the recent upgrade of Conda in Guix this bug no longer exists, so I’m closing this issue. -- Ricardo

bug#43296: Gnome Builder doesn't install.

2020-09-09 Thread Marinus Savoritias
Gnome builder fails to install with this message: swzg5y9hnggp7aghz8q2l-gnome-builder-3.36.1.drv' failed with exit code 1 build of /gnu/store/w2lzd0dc6qbswzg5y9hnggp7aghz8q2l-gnome-builder-3.36.1.drv failed The message in the log is this: ld: /gnu/store/sh764z2hm5qcr4cqx4amcipcbkvg76i2-libse

bug#43303: GCC package name

2020-09-09 Thread Jeffrey Walton
Hi Everyone, It took me about 15 minutes to install GCC on Guix because Guix named the GCC package libgccjit. I understand Guix package manager is powerful. I think you should use an alias feature (or whatever it is called under Guix), and create and few aliases to help with administration: g

bug#43303: GCC package name

2020-09-09 Thread Malte Gerdes
Hi, the GCC package itself isn't to useful. I think you are looking for the gcc-toolchain package which installs GCC, binutils and libc. Malte On Thu, 10 Sep 2020, 07:22 Jeffrey Walton, wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > It took me about 15 minutes to install GCC on Guix because Guix named > the GCC pa