Hi there,
The license of the "flint" package is currently set to gpl2+ but it really is
lgpl2.1+
Also, there was a bugfix release 2.6. which you might want to update to.
Cheers
Max
Hi
Elixir build is failing for me. Don't have time to debug right now. This is the
log:
phase `unpack' succeeded after 0.2 seconds
starting phase `make-git-checkout-writable'
phase `make-git-checkout-writable' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `replace-paths'
Backtrace:
18 (pr
Hullo Max,
Max Horn 写道：
The license of the "flint" package is currently set to gpl2+ but
it really is lgpl2.1+
Could you elaborate? How did you test this?
Also, there was a bugfix release 2.6. which you might want to
update to.
Done, thanks!
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Descripti
Hi,
> Am 08.08.2020 um 16:56 schrieb Tobias Geerinckx-Rice :
>
> Hullo Max,
>
> Max Horn 写道：
>> The license of the "flint" package is currently set to gpl2+ but it really
>> is lgpl2.1+
>
> Could you elaborate? How did you test this?
What, that the license is lgpl2.1+ ? That's what the webs
As reported by zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de, smalltalk fails in tests:
...
/gnu/store/pwcp239kjf7lnj5i4lkdzcfcxwcfyk72-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash
'./testsuite'
## --- ##
## GNU Smalltalk 3.2.5 test suite. ##
## --- ##
Regression tests.
Max,
Max Horn 写道：
What, that the license is lgpl2.1+ ?
Yes.
That's what the website states (right at the top of the front
page), along with an explanation that the license changed from
2.5 to 2.6. It is also what the README and the LICENSE files
state.
I'm aware. That's why I considered
Hah,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 写道：
I opened an issue[0] upstream earlier today but no reply yet.
Naturally, as soon as I send this, I get a notification this will
be fixed upstream.[0]
I'll add a comment to our flint package that the licence can be
changed to LGPL-2.1+ on the next FLINT releas
The description for sbcl-hu.dwim.common is empty. This is with Guix
8e6344a5fb22e2614dcb0db8e24658e63c6121c7.
Best,
Jack
