bug#39387: Builds are *not* offloaded when using the "--keep-failed" or -K option.

2020-02-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > In the second case, the build is started on the local machine instead of > being dispatched to the offload machine. Presumably, this is done so > that the files are available locally; but I'd prefer if it'd offload and > keep the files on the remote. An alt

bug#39394: vis editor doesn't respect user configuration

2020-02-02 Thread tsmish
Steps to reproduce: 1. Make file ~/.config/vis/visrc.lua with following text: ``` require('vis') vis.events.subscribe(vis.events.INIT, function() vis:command('qall') end) ``` 2. Open vis vis should immediately close on startup, but it doesn't. It happens because package defines $VIS_PATH sea

bug#39394: vis editor doesn't respect user configuration

2020-02-02 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Thanks for the report. tsmish ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 2., Vas 18:57): > Steps to reproduce: > 1. Make file ~/.config/vis/visrc.lua with following text: > ``` > require('vis') > > vis.events.subscribe(vis.events.INIT, function() > vis:command('qall') > end) > ``` > 2. Open vis > > vis

bug#39394: vis editor doesn't respect user configuration

2020-02-02 Thread Gábor Boskovits
tag 39394 easy quit

bug#39394: vis editor doesn't respect user configuration

2020-02-02 Thread tsmish
> I would go for renaming it like visrc.lua.example, or similar. I don't really like this solution because while this particular problem will be fixed, underlying issue of system paths having higher priority than user ones will stay. >From what I can figure out from the code(https://github.com/mar

bug#39301: imported module (guix build utils) overrides core binding `delete'

2020-02-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! strypst...@posteo.net skribis: > Whenever running "sudo guix system reconfigure /path/to/config.scm I > get the following warnings: > > building > /gnu/store/vpazjd711byj3jszh7jrk5d8lq51077g-switch-to-system.scm.drv... > ;;; WARNING: loading compiled file > /gnu/store/5bd6ywmfcxxa4gvpzg0pd

bug#39355: [PATCH] gnu: Add lf.

2020-02-02 Thread Leo Famulari
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:28:16AM +, Pkill -9 wrote: > * gnu/packages/disk.scm (lf): New variable. Thanks! I removed the superfluous #:unpack-path and pushed as d441a6455051d70d7ff0d951c7e68318499b1739 > --- > gnu/packages/disk.scm | 31 +++ > 1 file changed, 31

bug#39352: guix pull failing on aarch64

2020-02-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Jesse Gibbons skribis: > I've noticed most guix ops (including guix pull) hang on armhf as well, > but I don't have a log to provide. > Right now I'm fine with keeping guix at a stable (but potentially less > secure) commit until the JIT compiler in Guile 3 is fixed and enabled > on ARM.

bug#38250: PHP 7.3.11 fails its test suite

2020-02-02 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Fixed with commit 1eb343f9cf18544319bc4ac016845348816f7265. Closing.

bug#39400: Go retains a reference to GCC

2020-02-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! It seems that Go unduly retains a reference to GCC: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ guix size go store item totalself /gnu/store/g4rrz9rnr8ssbnj3gx3dmsxv4glll8nf-go-1.12.15 646.3 35

bug#39377: guix search reports bad location for bytestructures

2020-02-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Matt, Matt Wette skribis: > I'm using guix-1.0.1 on Fedora 30, x86_64. > > I wanted to get module spec for bytestructures, but failed: > location points to (guix packages), but it's actually in (gnu packages > guile). > > $ guix search bytestructures > name: guile3.0-bytestructures > version:

bug#39394: vis editor doesn't respect user configuration

2020-02-02 Thread Gábor Boskovits
tsmish ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 2., Vas 22:08): > > I would go for renaming it like visrc.lua.example, or similar. > > I don't really like this solution because while this particular > problem will be fixed, underlying issue of system paths having higher > priority than user ones will stay.

bug#39301: imported module (guix build utils) overrides core binding `delete'

2020-02-02 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Ludovic Courtès ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 2., Vas 22:15): > Hello! > > strypst...@posteo.net skribis: > > > Whenever running "sudo guix system reconfigure /path/to/config.scm I > > get the following warnings: > > > > building > > /gnu/store/vpazjd711byj3jszh7jrk5d8lq51077g-switch-to-system.s

bug#39352: guix pull failing on aarch64

2020-02-02 Thread shtwzrd via Bug reports for GNU Guix
In my case on aarch64, it appears to be deterministic. I've tried over a dozen times and it always fails in the exact same place. So perhaps aarch64 is a good target for debugging the underlying problem, if this and #39266 are related, as they appear to be. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On

bug#39402: set-xorg-configuration pulls in unsupported packages on target architecture

2020-02-02 Thread shtwzrd via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Howdy :), I've found that the `set-xorg-configuration` service ends up pulling in `xf86-video-intel` as a dependency. But `xf86-video-intel` fails to build, with: ``` checking whether to include UXA support... no checking whether to include SNA support... auto checking for xvmc dri2proto x11 x11