Ricardo Wurmus ezt írta (időpont: 2019. dec. 20., Pén
22:32):
>
> zimoun writes:
>
> > Then you ask one question: "Should Guix be volatile software?" with
> > the subtitle "Software developers should avoid traumatic changes".
> > Nothing more.
> > Well, I answer you by trying to fill the gap. No
Hi Ricardo,
> I wonder if we should simply bump the version number to indicate that
> this is a breaking change?
That's a possibility, but who ever looks at Guix version numbers?
> Another more difficult option would be to do what responsible API
> developers on the web do: to version their API
Hi!
We’re getting a hash mismatch for Yoshimi and ci.guix.gnu.org doesn’t
have it in cache:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix build yoshimi -S
La jena derivo estos konstruata:
/gnu/store/iz0h16wnnz4jf3h2fj8y6dzbkchw71g7-yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2.drv
building
Hi!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> I’m just chiming in here to say that feelings of frustration are very
> valid reasons to make or object to a change. Guix is or can be a very
> important piece of software — if it remains reliable in the toolbox of
> those using it.
>
> It is difficult striking the
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> We’re getting a hash mismatch for Yoshimi and ci.guix.gnu.org doesn’t
> have it in cache: […]
> Ricardo or anyone who might have the previous Yoshimi tarball, could you
> take a look?
I ran guix gc earlier today, so I no longer have the tarball :(
It’s a new release,
I recently built an installer image from a few commits before
4e09f57af8ee9ac3e7bd5a7a904c4cb6d8d44d9d. It boots fine and the
installer works up to the actual system installation, which then aborts
with an error indicating that the file
python-pep8-stdlib-tokenize-compat.patch could not be found.
When I first tried to install one of the new build servers for
ci.guix.gnu.org I forgot that the firewall rules prevent these servers
from accessing ci.guix.gnu.org via its public IP address. I started the
installation process and waited …
When I realized that I had to first add the internal IP t
