bug#38628: [PATCH] gexp: Allow character literals in GEXP->SEXP.

2019-12-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Marius, Marius Bakke skribis: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> Also it would be nice to add a tiny test close to the one that >>> 24ab804ce11fe12ff49cd144a3d9c4bfcf55b41c added. >> >> Good idea. I came up with this: >> >> diff --git a/tests/gexp.scm b/tests/gexp.s

bug#38529: Make --ad-hoc the default for guix environment proposed deprecation mechanism

2019-12-19 Thread zimoun
Hi Arne, Thank you for the pointers. On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 21:55, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Konrad Hinsen writes: > >> Maybe I miss a point. It is not: "watch out, this will do something > >> else in the future" but "watch out, this was doing something else in > >> the past and the cha

bug#38054: [bug#38395] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: mumble: Update to 1.3.0.)

2019-12-19 Thread Efraim Flashner
I merged the two patches together, made sure all the phases returned #t and flushed out the commit message some more. -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted sig

bug#38447: Guix Stand-alone OS installation Error - T410 - x86 - intel - lenova

2019-12-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > So we need to understand why the installer tries to build binutils instead > of relying on substitutes and why it fails. Could it be that there was a transient networking issue at the time of installation? Thanks, Ludo’.

bug#38529: Deprecating ‘guix environment’?

2019-12-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Konrad, Konrad Hinsen skribis: > On 16/12/2019 23:09, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> So in a more algorithmic manner: >>> 1. if ad-hoc and inputs-of is present at the same invocation: fail >>> hard. (With an error like incompatible options present) >>> 2. if only ad-hoc is present, then print a de

bug#38054: [bug#38395] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: mumble: Update to 1.3.0.)

2019-12-19 Thread Ivan Vilata i Balaguer
Efraim Flashner (2019-12-19 15:03:11 +0200) wrote: > I merged the two patches together, made sure all the phases returned #t > and flushed out the commit message some more. Thanks a lot! Comparing your final patch against mine was also very instructive. `:)` -- Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- https:

bug#38663: postgis is not reproducible

2019-12-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Björn Höfling skribis: > │ │ │0x00084000 322e342e 38003230 31392d31 322d3138 2.4.8.2019-12-18 > │ │ │ - 0x00084010 2031323a 33393a35 36002573 20722564 12:39:56.%s r%d > │ │ │ + 0x00084010 2031323a 33363a35 32002573 20722564 12:36:52.%s r%d I see a timestamps here! :-) Ludo’.

bug#38673: missing 'provenance' in $PROFILE/manifest

2019-12-19 Thread zimoun
Dear, As explained here [1], the field 'provenance' does not appear in $PROFILE/manifest when using the option --manifest; but appears when manually installing. Below instructions to reproduce the bug. [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-12/msg00135.html All the best, simon

bug#37471: Cannot make a disk image for the BeagleBone Black

2019-12-19 Thread Timothy Sample
I was able to build an image for the Beaglebone Black, and it even booted! It seems whatever problem I had has disappeared. Closing. -- Tim

bug#38663: postgis is not reproducible

2019-12-19 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello, Björn Höfling ezt írta (időpont: 2019. dec. 18., Sze, 22:16): > > Package postgis contains many timestamps, making it not reproducible. > > Some examples below. > > Björn > > > --- /gnu/store/121c447hzz55milkdp7ak15vxmsi1xpr-postgis-2.4.8 > +++ /gnu/store/121c447hzz55milkdp7ak15vxmsi1xpr-p

bug#38529: Make --ad-hoc the default for guix environment proposed deprecation mechanism

2019-12-19 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi zimoun, zimoun writes: >> Should Guix be volatile software? >> http://stevelosh.com/blog/2012/04/volatile-software/ > > Guix is not a volatile software and will never be. Because it is > rooted in time-travelling. > The tools "guix pull --commit=", "guix --manifest=", "guix > time-

bug#38529: Make --ad-hoc the default for guix environment proposed deprecation mechanism

2019-12-19 Thread zimoun
Hi Arne, First, have you read the proposal? Or are you (maybe a bit) "overreacting" about the backward compatibility? On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 22:39, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > zimoun writes: > > Guix is not a volatile software and will never be. Because it is > > rooted in time-travelling

bug#38529: Deprecating ‘guix environment’?

2019-12-19 Thread zimoun
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 17:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > The hard question then becomes: what do we call it? I vote against > abbreviations. :-) "guix shell"? Cheers, simon

bug#38529: Make --ad-hoc the default for guix environment proposed deprecation mechanism

2019-12-19 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
zimoun writes: > First, have you read the proposal? Yes. > Or are you (maybe a bit) "overreacting" about the backward compatibility? I don’t think so. I am definitely reacting strongly, but that’s because breakages in Guix have already cost me the evenings of several weeks this year. But befo

bug#38685: emacs-calfw: Fails to build

2019-12-19 Thread Ivan Vilata i Balaguer
Hi! After the last package update to commit f2c71f6 I noticed that `emacs-calfw` fails to build. ``` […] starting phase `build' Checking /gnu/store/hv8kyf44mrkag5458cgxc8k6yh6nkcg1-emacs-calfw-1.6/share/emacs/site-lisp/... Compiling /gnu/store/hv8kyf44mrkag5458cgxc8k6yh6nkcg1-emacs-calfw-1.6/sh