bug#37804: getmail service documentation error?

The documentation of the getmail service’s delete_after setting is confusing and appears to contradict upstream documentation at . I am not sure, but the code in the getmail file in the getmail source code also appears to call destination.deli

bug#37804: getmail service documentation error?

pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) writes: > The documentation of the getmail service’s delete_after setting is > confusing and appears to contradict upstream documentation at > . > > I am not sure, but the code in the getmail file in the getmail so

bug#37804: getmail service documentation error?

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 08:47:11AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: > The change and patch looks reasonable to me. Pushed. Thank you!

bug#37804: getmail service documentation error?

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:02:31AM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 08:47:11AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: > > The change and patch looks reasonable to me. > > > Pushed. Thank you! > > > I forgot prefixing the commit with doc. Too late now. Sorry.

bug#37803: [BUG] installer does seem to know about pep8 patch

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, October 18, 2019 2:48 AM, Kyle Andrews wrote: > I just tried to install guix on desktop system by piggy-backing from a > disk-image created on a laptop. > > I chose "Guided - using the entire disk with encryption" option. > > I then selected GNOME, ope

bug#37533: waybar fails to build

Closing this bug for now. We can reopen it if it becomes a problem again. -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#37779: encfs build fails: stdlib.h: No such file or directory

Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Since the move to gcc 7, encfs cannot be built: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > In file included from > /tmp/guix-build-encfs-1.9.5.drv-0/encfs-1.9.5/vendor/github.com/muflihun/easyloggingpp/src/easylogging++.h:340:0, >

bug#37778: ucl build fails: ACC conformance test failed.

Pierre Neidhardt writes: > ucl fails to build since the core-updates merge: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > ... > checking whether your compiler passes the ACC conformance test... FAILED > configure: > configure: Your compiler failed the ACC conformance te

bug#37801: Possible insight into issue #30756 #include_next bug

Hi Danny, Thank you so much for the links and quotes, I'm definitely going to refer back to them in the future and you probably saved me dozens of hours :-) > I think so. I can't figure out why Guix is not just setting up CROSS_CPATH > on its own in the first place. > gnu/packages/cross-base.scm

bug#37744: Per-user profile directory hijack (CVE-2019-17365 for Nix)

Bengt Richter skribis: > On +2019-10-17 22:25:58 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: [...] >> > Imperialist nitpick: why list the foreigners first? :-) >> > >> > Anti-imperialist nitpick: reversing the two allows using ‘other >> > distributions’ instead of ‘foreign’ which always sounds a bit >> > di

bug#37789: guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program

Ludovic Courtès writes: > This is not the key of ci.guix.gnu.org. Thanks for getting back to me. It turns out I mistakenly gave you this server's public key. SORRY. Also I forgot the system is configured not to use substitutes ... (guix-service-type conf

bug#37810: Rust 1.27 and later depends on GDB 8.2

Hello, After updating to GDB 8.3, the Rust 1.27 test suite started failing: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1840276/details Here are the relevant lines from the log file: --8<---cut here---start->8--- failures: [debuginfo-gdb] debuginfo/pretty-uninitializ

bug#37744: Per-user profile directory hijack (CVE-2019-17365 for Nix)

Hi Ludo, On +2019-10-18 16:36:30 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Bengt Richter skribis: > > > On +2019-10-17 22:25:58 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > [...] > > >> > Imperialist nitpick: why list the foreigners first? :-) > >> > > >> > Anti-imperialist nitpick: reversing the two allows using