bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. -- Cheers Swedebugia

bug#33676: GuixSD on eoma68-a20?

On 2018-12-23 06:09, swedebu...@riseup.net wrote: > On 2018-12-22 09:44, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: >> Please add to your /etc/config.scm to the "services" section: >> >> (service qemu-binfmt-service-type >> (qemu-binfmt-configuration >>(platforms (looku

bug#33845: test of hslua fail on i686

This is a dep of pandoc. sdb@antelope ~/Desktop$ guix --version guix (GNU Guix) 0.16.0-5.5de5f81 installed from git on sdb@antelope ~$ cd ~/src/guix && git log |head -1 commit d15211c9b5b46b96c5b658329624942b6ff5c917 starting phase `check' running "runhaskell Setup.hs" with command "test" and

bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

Hello, As discussed with Pierre at the R-B Summit, ‘sbcl-next’ lacks a reference to ‘next-gtk-webkit’ even though is invokes it: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ guix gc --references $(type -P next) | grep next- /gnu/store/9d66xb8wvggsp0x9pxj61mzqy007978f-sbcl-n

bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > As discussed with Pierre at the R-B Summit, ‘sbcl-next’ lacks a > reference to ‘next-gtk-webkit’ even though is invokes it: > > $ guix gc --references $(type -P next) | grep next- > /gnu/store/9d66xb8wvggsp0x9pxj61mzqy007978f-sbcl-next-1.1.0 > /gnu/store/pqy

bug#33378: offload: Avoid hosts with little or no free disk space

Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > >> ‘choose-build-machine’ in (guix scripts offload) could/should exclude >> build machines that don’t have at least, say, 100 MiB available in their >> store. That would avoid ENOSPC build failures such as >>

bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] >> Apparently this string literal is stored as UTF-32 (UCS-4) or similar, >> which prevents the reference scanner and the grafting code from finding >> it, and problems ensue. :-) > > IMO, we should consider modifying Guix to se

bug#33854: StumpWM build failing.

Hi all, StumpWM is failing to build on my machine. Can anybody replicate this? I am away from my computer at the moment, will provide logs later if needed. Best,Brett Gilio Sent from my Sprint Phone.

bug#33378: offload: Avoid hosts with little or no free disk space

Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: >> >>> ‘choose-build-machine’ in (guix scripts offload) could/should exclude >>> build machines that don’t have at least, say, 100 MiB available in their >>> store. That would avoid ENOSPC bu

bug#33854: StumpWM build failing.

Hi, Thank you for notice this. "bre...@posteo.net" writes: > Hi all, StumpWM is failing to build on my machine. Can anybody > replicate this? […] The build farm can https://ci.guix.info/build/721131 Oleg. signature.asc Description: PGP signature