bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64

I've been unable to successfully build guix on aarch64 for a while, as it fails several tests. This prevents "guix system reconfigure" from working. It also fails with "guix build guix" as well as trying to build from a local git checkout. FAIL: tests/graph.scm FAIL: tests/guix-package.sh FAIL: te

bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64

Possible workaround (not that mit-scheme works on aarch64 then, but at least guix does): diff --git a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm index c7ab00380..25852d2af 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm @@ -70,12 +70,7 @@ #:use-module (ice-9 match))

bug#33676: GuixSD on eoma68-a20?

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 02:04:58PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > >> See also > >> https://blog.merovius.de/2013/10/20/ext4-mysterious-no-space-left-on.html > > It was, and I disabled it. Hopefully this does not break anything... > Why did you disable it? Because we get exactly these spurious ENOS

bug#33639: ISO installer image is broken on i686

Hi Thomas, "Thomas Schmitt" skribis: > I have now a qemu-system-i386 VM with Debian GNU/Linux from > debian-9.6.0-i386-netinst.iso without desktop environment and reachable > via SSH. Very minimal. (I only did "apt-get install build-essential" to > feel not lonely without C compiler and friends.

bug#33676: GuixSD on eoma68-a20?

Hi Danny, Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:48:52 +0100 > Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> I believe you can download it by running: >> >> guix build /gnu/store/ywrh286iqc3jlfhjqsvs22gmcr02i2bp-disk-image.drv > > I don't have it. > >> If you don’t have this .drv, you should be

bug#33755: error: execlp: No such file or directory from guix environment

Hello comrades! Timothy Sample skribis: > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > >> Hi Tim, >> >> I like it in princple, but why special-case ENOENT? I think it would >> be better to just always print the program name (and maybe program >> args, too!) and the system error message. > > You are right. [.

bug#33639: ISO installer image is broken on i686

Hi, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > If you’re testing in a VM you might just as well download the GuixSD VM > image from . There i only see only "x86_64" for QEMU, not "i686" like with ISO or Binary. > Did you actually run “guix archive --authorize < …/ci.g

bug#33772: StumpWM broken commands?

It seems to me that StumpWM broke somehow, for some reason. I can confirm there was a version change: -sbcl-stumpwm@18.05:out /gnu/store/i0picr2xr2aq2a52nsaw67nvar1r3khw-sbcl-stumpwm-18.05 +sbcl-stumpwm@18.11:out /gnu/store/6h2iln76dx8pxdp1hsaqb1yncm8viczj-sbcl-stumpwm-18.11 I am

bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64

Should be fixed on master. Can you confirm? pgp31otuP9YVH.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#33676: GuixSD on eoma68-a20?

Hi Ludo, > > The following package will be installed: > >guile-bootstrap 2.0 > > /tmp/guix-tests/store/1gd1z2r2a38bh3a4494jbhyzcv5mi5hl-guile-bootstrap-2.0 > > The solution I proposed only works if you’re using /gnu/store as your > store prefix. Otherwise you cannot get substitut

bug#33737: do not attempt to build a package known to be broken

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 05:41:37 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > The default use case is for users to have substitutes enabled and to > fetch binaries from a build farm. The build farm tries to build all > packages, but not all builds succeed. The daemon caches build failures. > > This information,

bug#33737: do not attempt to build a package known to be broken

Danny Milosavljevic writes: >> I propose that “guix publish” should also convey information about >> failed builds. The Guix client can then abort right away without >> wasting time and power to attempt a doomed build. Users may override >> this with “--fallback” or a new option. > > As long

bug#33755: error: execlp: No such file or directory from guix environment

Hi Ludo, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello comrades! > > Timothy Sample skribis: > >> [...] >> >> From aedc745a3f9765ae00dc61a59fa53d22a458551b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Timothy Sample >> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 23:17:46 -0500 >> Subject: [PATCH] environment: Print command name on execlp

bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64

On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:12:08PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Should be fixed on master. Can you confirm? Vagrant confirmed on IRC that it is fixed on master. As suggested in the armhf bug about the same issue, now that it's working we should tag a new commit. -- Efraim Flashner