Ricardo Wurmus ezt írta (időpont: 2018. szept. 7., P
23:51):
> It is possible to add a build phase to a non-existing phase without an
> error. The new build phase will simply not be executed.
>
> This is problematic when an inherited package augments the original
> package’s phases and the origi
This patch introduces a new package named `openblas-ilp64', which uses
the ILP64 model.
The library name contains the suffix "_ilp64" to the library name and so
hopefully may co-exist with the existing `openblas' port.
>From 8c9728eb66a45fd42f208df66d323981837c9c0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
Alex Kost writes:
> Ludovic Courtès (2018-09-06 11:09 +0200) wrote:
>
>>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception:
>>> no code for module (guix hash)
>>> make[2]: [Makefile:556: emacs-guix/hash.go] Error 1 (ignored)
>>
>> I suppose Emacs-Guix might need to use (gcrypt hash) ins
George Clemmer (2018-09-10 10:31 -0400) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2018-09-06 11:09 +0200) wrote:
>>
ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception:
no code for module (guix hash)
make[2]: [Makefile:556: emacs-guix/hash.go] Error 1 (ignored)
>>>
>>>
Alex Kost writes:
> George Clemmer (2018-09-10 10:31 -0400) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost writes:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès (2018-09-06 11:09 +0200) wrote:
>>>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception:
> no code for module (guix hash)
> make[2]: [Makefile:556: emacs-guix/has
Hello, Guix.
I want to use Guile modules produced by ‘guix pack --relocatable guix’,
but I get the following error:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix --version
guix (GNU Guix) 0084744b3af0a6f8e125120143f57567902339a8
Copyright (C) 2018 the Guix authors
Licens
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> (guix build syscalls) provides %prctl which assumes that the “prctl” is
> available. On Debian GNU/Hurd (which the custom glibc
> 2.23-hurd+libpthread-20161218) this is not the case.
>
> Since this is used for “set-thread-name”, which is used by (guix scripts
> substitu
guitarix-lv2-0.37.1 fails with `waf: error: no such option: --lv2-only`
I think the right option is `--no-standalone`, described with "Don't
build standalone (JACK) application".
---
gnu/packages/audio.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/audio
It seems that this is caused by having the files in a directory that is not
stripped.
I will try to have another look at that.
Hi Thorsten,
thanks for the fix! They must have changed configure flags.
I pushed it with commit 029de52fe9f5f8aa2b2ef462c30118cbb9721f64 to the
master branch after updating and building both guitarix and
guitarix-lv2.
--
Ricardo
Hi Oleg,
Oleg Pykhalov skribis:
> I want to use Guile modules produced by ‘guix pack --relocatable guix’,
> but I get the following error:
[...]
> Backtrace:
>3 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/rdapiwpqxx2hkdd58zbjjs7x1i9…")
> In guix/build/profiles.scm:
> 152:2 2 (build-profile "/
Dear Guix:
I am pleased to submit a patch that adds OpenMolcas to Guix. Also
included in this submission is a new variable called `openblas-ilp64'
which OpenMolcas needs to compile and run.
I would like to point out that I have already submitted the
openblas-ilp64 patch to the list for approval,
Alex Kost skribis:
> Clément Lassieur (2018-09-05 21:36 +0200) wrote:
>
>> emacs-guix doesn't build, because of guile-gcrypt
>
> I have released Emacs-Guix 0.5, that depends on guile-gcrypt, so it
> should be fixed now (I hope :-)).
Thank you!
Ludo’.
13 matches
Mail list logo
