bug#31560: Commit 47a60325c broke tests/pack.scm

2018-06-01 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi Ludo, I believe the attached patches fix the issue when applied to the master branch. The failing test now passes (along with all the other "make check" tests). What do you think? If you approve, then I'll commit it to the master branch. l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Chris Marus

bug#31159: #31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries

2018-06-01 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hello, I tought this one was pushed and told Clément it was ok to push, my mistake! I just pushed it, so I close the ticket now. To people used to select bootloader entries with shortcuts, be aware that at next reconfigure, the entries will be reversed on all bootloaders (top of the list => mos

bug#22629: [PATCH 0/4] 'guix pull' produces a self-contained Guix

2018-06-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: >> The result of running ‘guix pull’ is a “profile” available under >> ‘~/.config/guix/current’ containing the latest Guix. Thus, make sure to >> add it to the beginning of your search path so that you use the latest >> version, and similarly for the In

bug#22629: [PATCH 0/4] 'guix pull' produces a self-contained Guix

2018-06-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Heya David, "Thompson, David" skribis: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hello Guix! >> >> Here is the “new” ‘guix pull’ that we discussed notably in this thread: >> >> https://bugs.gnu.org/22629 >> >> The major difference is that instead of just building a bunch o

bug#31669: 'guix system' enhancements

2018-06-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Rutger Helling skribis: > This isn't really a bug, but I noticed that 'guix system' right now cannot > use certain common build > options like 'with-input'. I don't know how hard it would be to add > that, because I think it could be pretty useful for something like the > following for e

bug#31560: Commit 47a60325c broke tests/pack.scm

2018-06-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Chris Marusich skribis: > I believe the attached patches fix the issue when applied to the master > branch. The failing test now passes (along with all the other "make > check" tests). What do you think? If you approve, then I'll commit it > to the master branch. I looked some more an

bug#31669: 'guix system' enhancements

2018-06-01 Thread Rutger Helling
Hi Ludo, That might cause confusion like you said, so I'm not sure if that would be an improvement. I guess I was wondering whether there was an easy way to do something like build your entire system with a newer Mesa, or use LibreSSL instead of OpenSSL as mentioned. Of course you could change y

bug#31669: 'guix system' enhancements

2018-06-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Rutger Helling skribis: > That might cause confusion like you said, so I'm not sure if that would > be an improvement. > > I guess I was wondering whether there was an easy way to do something > like build your entire system with a newer Mesa, or use LibreSSL > instead of OpenSSL as ment

bug#31680: guix system reconfigure: Inscrutable error message when adding same service twice

2018-06-01 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
I got an inscrutable error message: -- [...] `/gnu/store/xbihzbddsl12499nam1frafm3xwx0fhl-upower-0.99.4/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.UPower.service' -> `/gnu/store/x2vkzm0by6mlby0cwjk0ir5aycfjn9wf-upower-wrapper/share/dbus-1/system-services