On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:33:36PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:45:39AM -0900, Christopher Howard wrote:
> > I was able to make more progress with the --substitute-urls=... option
> > you mentioned. However, later, when the system is building the
> > gnupg-2.1.13 drv (I d
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
>
>> On 2016-11-28 12:00, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>>> Hi Luis,
>>>
>>> Indeed, I had a first bash at solving this problem by providing a
>>> set of
>>> static html pages paginated by the first letter of the package name.
>>>
>>> I'm
I have a nice one too. How to run guixsd on any hardware :)
(use-modules (gnu)
(gnu system nss)
(guix build-system trivial)
(guix download)
(guix git-download)
(guix packages))
(use-service-modules base networking)
(use-package-modul
This was recently fixed in the core-updates branch.
J'
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Tom ??ech wrote:
mount command from util-linux is expecting helpers in /sbin/
directory, which is not available on GuixSD.
If found it when I tried to mount manully NFS:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:58:39PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington skribis:
> Whenever I run
>
> make check-system TESTS=openssh
>
> it gets as far as:
>
>
> PASS: tests/test-filter-redirector
> TEST: tests/postcopy-test...
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:45:39AM -0900, Christopher Howard wrote:
>> I was able to make more progress with the --substitute-urls=... option
>> you mentioned. However, later, when the system is building the
>> gnupg-2.1.13 drv (I did not pass --fallback, but it still buil
David Craven skribis:
> I have a nice one too. How to run guixsd on any hardware :)
This is off-topic, and it is not what this project is about, as you
know (well of course, we all want it to run on any hardware, just not at
any cost!).
Ludo’.
Hello,
Chris Marusich skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> So I think what we need to do is for “guix pull-ng” to build and install
>> a complete ‘guix’ package, and to manage it pretty much like other
>> packages is managed,
>
> I think that's very reasonable. It seems more
Hi,
> Hartmut Goebel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just updated kde-frameworks to 5.28 and found that not all updates
>> have been discovered.
>>
>> Those where the URL is following the standard schema where found:
>> "mirror://kde/stable/frameworks/" (version-major+minor version) "/" name
>> "-" versio
