bug#22883: gpg2 vs. gpg

2016-06-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 09:51:45AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote: >> Given that Guix is a new distro you should really try to get rid of 1.4 >> and only use 2.1. For Windows we use the name "gpg" for a long time now >> and there is a configure option --enable-gpg2-is-gpg to ma

bug#23718: guix import shows wrong program

2016-06-07 Thread Efraim Flashner
I ran `guix import gnu make' and got the following output: http://sprunge.us/LHGD I separately downloaded make-4.2.tar.bz2 and the displayed hash was the correct one, but the other fields were wrong. -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351

bug#22883: gpg2 vs. gpg

2016-06-07 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:08, l...@gnu.org said: > Nevertheless, we could configure GPG 2.x with --enable-gpg2-is-gpg, if > that’s what Werner recommends. It would help to avoid trouble in the future. Debian will also install gpg2 as gpg and provide 1.4 only a non-mandatory package gnupg1. Shalom

bug#22883: gpg2 vs. gpg

2016-06-07 Thread ng0
On 2016-06-07(01:25:44+0200), Werner Koch wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:08, l...@gnu.org said: > > > Nevertheless, we could configure GPG 2.x with --enable-gpg2-is-gpg, if > > that’s what Werner recommends. > > It would help to avoid trouble in the future. Debian will also install > gpg2 as gpg

bug#23723: patch-shebang phase breaks symlinks

2016-06-07 Thread Jelle Licht
Hi Guix, It seems that the patch-shebang functionality does not deal gracefully with symlinks: it just overwrites them! After struggling somewhat with getting the recently packaged node 6.0.0 to behave, I found out that `patch-shebang' in (guix build gnu-build-system) does not work properly on sy