bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?

2016-01-01 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 04:55:40PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:16:31 -0500 > > Leo Famulari wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:45:14PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > >> [...] > >> [...] > >> [...] > >> [...] > >> [...

bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?

2016-01-01 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 04:25:40PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 04:55:40PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:16:31 -0500 > > > Leo Famulari wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:45:14PM +0100, Mathieu Lirz

bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?

2016-01-01 Thread Andreas Enge
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:26:56AM -0600, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > If the @ is for the optional choice of including a version, I'm good > with it. It does mean we can never have @ in our package names, but > that might be a good restriction anyway :) According to the packaging guidelines

bug#22280: failure of `guix graph --type=bag-emerged hello`

2016-01-01 Thread Leo Famulari
When attempting `guix graph --type=bag-emerged hello`, the program crashes and produces a backtrace. I am using an up-to-date Guix on Debian Stretch. $ uname -a Linux jasmine 4.3.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.3.3-2 (2015-12-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux Here is the full output of the command invocation: ;;;

bug#22281: grub.cfg incorrectly determines root device

2016-01-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
As Chris notes at , the generated grub.cfg on GuixSD should search the root by UUID or label rather than by file. Ludo’.

bug#22276: .sig

2016-01-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, I’ve amended that section of the manual based on text from the announcement (see ). Step 1 becomes: --8<---cut here---start->8--- 1. Download the binary tarball from ‘ftp://alpha.gnu.

bug#22137: python-urwid on x86_64: AsyncEventLoopTest

2016-01-01 Thread Leo Famulari
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:05:56AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > python-urwid-1.3.0 fails to build on x86_64 during the > "AsyncioEventLoopTest" test with the error "KeyError: '5 is not > registered'". It has failed repeatedly for some time now. It fails in > the same way when updated to python-urwi

bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?

2016-01-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:16:31 -0500 > Leo Famulari wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:45:14PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: >> [...] >> [...] >> [...] >> [...] >> [...] >> [...] >> > >> > I'm OK with that. Since choosing the reserved characters is

bug#22274: GuixSD resets hardware clock (on Lenovo x200 with libreboot)

2016-01-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > If I reboot into GuixSD, at some point in the boot process it resets my > hardware clock to 1970! If I reboot into Debian again after that, it's > 1970 there also. Ouch! Your config includes the ntp daemon. Could it be that it’s misbehaving? You can remove

bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?

2016-01-01 Thread carl hansen
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Leo Famulari wrote: > > > I did this: > $ apt-cache pkgnames | tr -d 'a-zA-Z0-9' | tr -d - | tr -d '\n' > > The only remaining characters were '.' and '+'. > > > I did: ls -1 /var/cache/apt/archive/ | tr -d 'a-zA-Z0-9' | tr -d - | tr -d '\n' Got: . + % ~ _ typica

bug#22274: GuixSD resets hardware clock (on Lenovo x200 with libreboot)

2016-01-01 Thread Mark H Weaver
Christopher Allan Webber writes: > I recently installed GuixSD on the laptop I got fresh from Minifree. I > was happy to see how much worked, but I've noticed a bug that occurs in > GuixSD but not in Debian. > > In Debian I can set the hardware clock (with `hwclock -w`) and if I > reboot back in