Hi Ludovic,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> Honestly, I wouldn’t worry about the propagation of $GUILE_LOAD_PATH &
>>> co. to subprocesses, because we know there’s none anyway.
>>
>> That policy will lead to future w
Am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2013 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
> Anyway, in the case of w3m, there are quite a variety of licenses used:
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/w/w3m/w3m_0.5.3-8/w3m.c
> opyright
It looks like essentially, a w3m license is used, with a little bit of X11
interspers
Hello all,
Here's a preliminary patch that does two things:
* Changes 'guix-build' and 'guix-package --install' so that only the
newest packages will be considered (unless a version number is
specified).
* Implements 'guix-package --upgrade'.
Although I'm not aware of any functional problem
I wrote:
> Here's a patch to inhibit the same package (in the sense of eq?) from
> being traversed more than once by fold-packages. One example where this
> helps is the guile-2.0 package in (gnu packages guile), which is
> exported in two different variables: guile-2.0 and guile-2.0/fixed.
>
> No
I wrote:
> Here's a preliminary patch that does two things:
>
> * Changes 'guix-build' and 'guix-package --install' so that only the
> newest packages will be considered (unless a version number is
> specified).
>
> * Implements 'guix-package --upgrade'.
>
> Although I'm not aware of any functi
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Honestly, I wouldn’t worry about the propagation of $GUILE_LOAD_PATH &
co. to subprocesses, because we know there’s none anyway.
>>>
>>> That policy
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>> Maybe we need a command-line interface to that?
>
> I think so. Should it be a separate file (e.g., 'guix-hash')?
Yes. If you want to work on it, there are bits from guix-download that
can be reused. I’d recommend keeping the --format option, for instance.
Ludo’
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> So I've been working on a patch to fix the ./pre-inst-env problem using
> portable shell code instead of Guile code, as you suggested, and this is
> the kind of code I'm coming up with:
The first snippet looks good to me.
> but the more I look at this ugly, buggy code;
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> I wrote:
>> Here's a preliminary patch that does two things:
>>
>> * Changes 'guix-build' and 'guix-package --install' so that only the
>> newest packages will be considered (unless a version number is
>> specified).
>>
>> * Implements 'guix-package --upgrade'.
>>
>>
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>> Could you perhaps send several examples with a sample of sans-sérif
>> that you have? :-)
>
> I've attached the file. The one on the left is the current version with
> "more pastel colors." This is my favorite version because (1) the
> typeface is clean and (2) th
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Here's a patch to inhibit the same package (in the sense of eq?) from
> being traversed more than once by fold-packages. One example where this
> helps is the guile-2.0 package in (gnu packages guile), which is
> exported in two different variables: guile-2.0 and guile-2
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> w3m raises the following error:
>
> istream.h:23:8: error: redefinition of 'struct file_handle'
>
> I found the needed patch [1]. But I don't want to apply it because it
> requires a knowledge of C. Could anyone help me to finalize the recipe?
The patch is just a m
Andreas Enge skribis:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2013 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
>> Anyway, in the case of w3m, there are quite a variety of licenses used:
>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/w/w3m/w3m_0.5.3-8/w3m.c
>> opyright
>
> It looks like essentially, a w3m license is used, with
* gnu/packages/vim.scm: New file.
* Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it.
---
"guix-build vim" seems to work now, even though I can't try to install it
(probably because I'm running out of inodes).
Andreas, could you please test this and push the patch if this works for you ?
Regards,
Cyril.
Makefile.
Hi Ludovic,
In commit d9d466ddff2091f4b1f94599335b5947a17def2c, you added the
following packages:
guile-reader-for-guile-1.8.8
guile-reader-for-guile-2.0.7
The "1.8.8" and "2.0.7" are actually part of the package names (both of
these packages are at version 0.6).
Unfortunately, this means t
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andreas Enge skribis:
>
>> Additionally, the file matrix.c looks non-free to me:
>> "3. No charge is made for this software or works derived from it.
>> This clause shall not be construed as constraining other software
>> distributed on the
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Other than that, please push!
Okay, I incorporated your suggestions and pushed it.
Thanks,
Mark
@ build-succeeded /nix/store/swa7j95kvdp8gi49b59llckmkb73z5b9-hello-2.8.drv
/nix/store/3nlfldhm3ckl319jhnb1rdwgi0c7kf38-hello-2.8
/nix/store/3nlfldhm3ckl319jhnb1rdwgi0c7kf38-hello-2.8
I'm attaching three patches.
'0001-gnu-Disable-Libtool-s-testsuite.patch' and
'0001-gnu-Set-ARCH-to-mips.patch' a
18 matches
Mail list logo
